All Podcasts
Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month
Transcript
- 00:00 --> 00:02Support for Yale Cancer Answers
- 00:02 --> 00:05comes from AstraZeneca, dedicated
- 00:05 --> 00:08to providing innovative treatment
- 00:08 --> 00:13options for people living with
- 00:13 --> 00:13cancer. Learn more at astrazeneca-us.com.
- 00:13 --> 00:16Welcome to Yale Cancer Answers with
- 00:16 --> 00:18your host doctor Anees Chagpar.
- 00:18 --> 00:20Yale Cancer Answers features the
- 00:20 --> 00:22latest information on cancer care by
- 00:22 --> 00:24welcoming oncologists and specialists
- 00:24 --> 00:26who are on the forefront of the
- 00:26 --> 00:28battle to fight cancer. This week
- 00:28 --> 00:30it's a conversation about pancreatic
- 00:30 --> 00:31cancer with Doctor Jeremy Kortmansky.
- 00:31 --> 00:33Doctor Kortmansky
- 00:33 --> 00:34is an associate professor
- 00:34 --> 00:36of clinical medicine in medical
- 00:36 --> 00:38oncology at the Yale School of
- 00:38 --> 00:40Medicine where Doctor Chagpar is
- 00:40 --> 00:42a professor of surgical oncology.
- 00:43 --> 00:45So Jeremy,
- 00:45 --> 00:48I think we all hear about pancreatic
- 00:48 --> 00:51cancer when it affects celebrities, right?
- 00:51 --> 00:54So whether it was Steve Jobs or
- 00:54 --> 00:57other stars we hear
- 00:57 --> 00:59about pancreatic cancer,
- 00:59 --> 01:02once in a blue moon.
- 01:02 --> 01:05It doesn't seem to be a terribly
- 01:05 --> 01:07common cancer.
- 01:07 --> 01:10Can you tell us a little bit
- 01:10 --> 01:12more about how frequently
- 01:12 --> 01:14pancreatic cancer is diagnosed?
- 01:14 --> 01:18How many people get it?
- 01:18 --> 01:20And who really are the
- 01:20 --> 01:22people that it most affects?
- 01:22 --> 01:24Yes,
- 01:24 --> 01:25pancreatic cancer
- 01:25 --> 01:28is actually becoming an increasingly
- 01:28 --> 01:31more common cancer that we see.
- 01:31 --> 01:33It's now the 5th leading cause
- 01:33 --> 01:36of cancer in the United States,
- 01:36 --> 01:39at about 60,000 new cases a year.
- 01:39 --> 01:43So we're not only seeing increasing numbers,
- 01:43 --> 01:46but also really moving up the
- 01:46 --> 01:49rank of how often we see it.
- 01:49 --> 01:52And you know it's interesting you brought
- 01:52 --> 01:56up Steve Jobs and and other celebrities.
- 01:56 --> 02:00Most recently, I think Alex Trebek is one
- 02:00 --> 02:02and it's important to make distinctions
- 02:02 --> 02:06when we talk about pancreatic cancer,
- 02:06 --> 02:08there's two main types there
- 02:08 --> 02:09is pancreatic adenocarcinoma,
- 02:09 --> 02:14which is by far the more common one that is
- 02:14 --> 02:18the disease that we're talking about
- 02:18 --> 02:22when we think about 60,000 cases per year.
- 02:22 --> 02:24And then there are pancreatic
- 02:24 --> 02:25neuroendocrine tumors,
- 02:25 --> 02:27which are a lot less common.
- 02:27 --> 02:30They are only seen in a few
- 02:30 --> 02:32thousand patients a year,
- 02:32 --> 02:34and it's important
- 02:34 --> 02:36to make the distinction because
- 02:36 --> 02:38they behave very differently and
- 02:38 --> 02:40their treatments are very different.
- 02:42 --> 02:44So, let's start with
- 02:44 --> 02:44pancreatic adenocarcinoma,
- 02:44 --> 02:47because I think that most people,
- 02:47 --> 02:49when they use the term generically
- 02:49 --> 02:51pancreatic cancer that tends to
- 02:51 --> 02:53be what they're referring to.
- 02:53 --> 02:55Although your point is well taken
- 02:55 --> 02:57with regards to neuroendocrine tumors,
- 02:57 --> 03:00but tell us a little bit more
- 03:00 --> 03:02about who gets these cancers.
- 03:02 --> 03:05I mean, what are the risk factors?
- 03:06 --> 03:09So I think like other cancers,
- 03:09 --> 03:12smoking is a common risk factor.
- 03:12 --> 03:17It can be related to problems that cause
- 03:17 --> 03:20chronic inflammation of the pancreas so
- 03:20 --> 03:23alcoholism can lead to pancreas cancer.
- 03:23 --> 03:26Chronic gallstone disease can,
- 03:26 --> 03:29although that's much less common.
- 03:29 --> 03:34Obesity can be a risk factor as well.
- 03:34 --> 03:36And then there is some question
- 03:36 --> 03:39of the relationship with diabetes
- 03:39 --> 03:41and whether diabetes could be a
- 03:41 --> 03:44risk factor or whether the disease
- 03:44 --> 03:46itself causes the diabetes.
- 03:46 --> 03:48And that's something that's
- 03:48 --> 03:50still being worked out.
- 03:50 --> 03:53And then there is a smaller percentage
- 03:53 --> 03:56of patients where it's hereditary cancer.
- 03:56 --> 03:58There are some genetic abnormalities
- 03:58 --> 04:02that we know of that are associated
- 04:02 --> 04:04with pancreas cancer and
- 04:04 --> 04:07one that is of recent importance
- 04:07 --> 04:10is its relation to the BRCA gene,
- 04:10 --> 04:12which is a gene that we most
- 04:12 --> 04:15often think about with breast and
- 04:15 --> 04:17ovarian cancer syndromes,
- 04:17 --> 04:20but is also related to pancreas
- 04:20 --> 04:21cancer as well,
- 04:21 --> 04:24and that has had some recent
- 04:24 --> 04:25implications on treatment.
- 04:27 --> 04:30So when we think
- 04:30 --> 04:32about these risk factors,
- 04:32 --> 04:35I'm thinking about a very good friend
- 04:35 --> 04:39of mine who actually was diagnosed with
- 04:39 --> 04:42pancreatic cancer just over Thanksgiving.
- 04:42 --> 04:45And who didn't fit any of those categories.
- 04:45 --> 04:47She had no family history.
- 04:47 --> 04:49She is skinny, like a rail,
- 04:49 --> 04:51she doesn't have diabetes,
- 04:51 --> 04:53doesn't drink, doesn't have gallstones.
- 04:53 --> 04:56You know, in those people where
- 04:56 --> 04:59they don't seem to have any
- 04:59 --> 05:01of the common risk factors that you
- 05:01 --> 05:04think about for pancreatic cancer,
- 05:04 --> 05:06does that tell us anything about
- 05:06 --> 05:09the biology of their disease?
- 05:09 --> 05:11I mean, are there other things
- 05:11 --> 05:13that we can think of
- 05:13 --> 05:16in terms of their risk factors,
- 05:16 --> 05:18and does that
- 05:18 --> 05:20have anything to
- 05:20 --> 05:22do with their prognosis?
- 05:23 --> 05:26I think that those are
- 05:26 --> 05:27all very good questions.
- 05:27 --> 05:30There are risk
- 05:30 --> 05:32factors that we can identify and
- 05:32 --> 05:35then there are patients who get
- 05:35 --> 05:38cancer for really no good reason.
- 05:38 --> 05:40And those are people that
- 05:40 --> 05:44we are still trying to maybe figure
- 05:44 --> 05:46out whether there was something
- 05:46 --> 05:48hereditary or environmental or some
- 05:48 --> 05:51other factor that we just haven't
- 05:51 --> 05:54identified yet that played a role.
- 05:54 --> 05:59When it comes to pancreas cancer,
- 05:59 --> 06:05the implications of how you got it,
- 06:05 --> 06:06except in in certain circumstances,
- 06:06 --> 06:08like the BRCA gene but,
- 06:08 --> 06:11otherwise how you got it doesn't
- 06:11 --> 06:14play as much of a role into how we
- 06:14 --> 06:16might think about treating it or
- 06:16 --> 06:19how we might expect it to behave.
- 06:20 --> 06:24So the the other question is,
- 06:27 --> 06:30when you talk about it
- 06:30 --> 06:33being the fifth most common cancer
- 06:33 --> 06:36and we think about the list right?
- 06:36 --> 06:38Breast cancer, prostate cancer,
- 06:38 --> 06:40colon cancer for all of these,
- 06:40 --> 06:42more commonly diagnosed cancers,
- 06:42 --> 06:45there's a screening test we
- 06:45 --> 06:47can find these cancers early.
- 06:47 --> 06:49Is there a screening test
- 06:49 --> 06:50for pancreatic cancer?
- 06:51 --> 06:54There isn't a good or routine
- 06:54 --> 06:57screening test for pancreas cancer.
- 06:57 --> 07:00I think that we know that there are
- 07:00 --> 07:04some patients that have been discovered
- 07:04 --> 07:07to have either a family history
- 07:07 --> 07:10or patients that have been found
- 07:10 --> 07:15to have pancreatic cysts on their
- 07:15 --> 07:18imaging that may have been obtained
- 07:18 --> 07:21for some other reason that we can
- 07:21 --> 07:24follow and certainly here at Yale,
- 07:24 --> 07:26we have an excellent screening
- 07:26 --> 07:28program where we can refer patients
- 07:28 --> 07:31to our gastroenterologists who
- 07:31 --> 07:33can perform screening procedures,
- 07:33 --> 07:35but that's really identifying those
- 07:35 --> 07:38who are already at a heightened risk
- 07:38 --> 07:41and not for the whole population like
- 07:41 --> 07:44we think about with colonoscopies
- 07:44 --> 07:46for colon cancer or mammograms
- 07:47 --> 07:48for breast cancer,
- 07:48 --> 07:51it's really an already pre determined
- 07:51 --> 07:53population because the screening
- 07:53 --> 07:56includes much more advanced or invasive
- 07:56 --> 08:00testing like MRI's or endoscopic ultrasound.
- 08:00 --> 08:03So it's a much more complex
- 08:03 --> 08:06way to follow patients.
- 08:06 --> 08:09And so without a screening test for
- 08:09 --> 08:11asymptomatic people who otherwise,
- 08:11 --> 08:13haven't had any
- 08:13 --> 08:15abnormality that's been found
- 08:15 --> 08:17incidentally, what are
- 08:17 --> 08:20the ways in
- 08:20 --> 08:23which they present?
- 08:23 --> 08:25How is it that somebody
- 08:25 --> 08:28cues into the fact that, Oh my gosh,
- 08:28 --> 08:30this could be a pancreatic cancer.
- 08:30 --> 08:33What are the symptoms and signs to look for?
- 08:34 --> 08:38I again think this is an area
- 08:38 --> 08:40that becomes challenging that
- 08:40 --> 08:43the symptoms that people have,
- 08:43 --> 08:47at least initially can often be vague.
- 08:47 --> 08:50There can be some discomfort
- 08:50 --> 08:52in the abdomen, with eating,
- 08:52 --> 08:54sometimes increased belching,
- 08:54 --> 08:58or increased gas may be a symptom.
- 08:58 --> 09:00Things that are very easily
- 09:00 --> 09:03attributable to something else until
- 09:03 --> 09:06the symptoms become more significant.
- 09:06 --> 09:08Sometimes people present without
- 09:08 --> 09:10any symptoms but develop jaundice,
- 09:10 --> 09:13they notice yellowing
- 09:13 --> 09:15of their eyes or their skin,
- 09:15 --> 09:18which certainly tips them off,
- 09:18 --> 09:20their families that there's something
- 09:20 --> 09:23going on that requires further evaluation.
- 09:23 --> 09:24But because these symptoms
- 09:24 --> 09:26can sometimes be vague,
- 09:26 --> 09:29they can also be attributed to the
- 09:29 --> 09:32much more common problems that we see,
- 09:32 --> 09:35irritable bowel or reflux which can
- 09:35 --> 09:38lead to delays in making a diagnosis.
- 09:40 --> 09:42And so I mean that really gets
- 09:42 --> 09:45to the crux of the issue, right?
- 09:45 --> 09:49Is that without screening and with
- 09:49 --> 09:52the symptoms that are incredibly vague,
- 09:52 --> 09:54I would surmise that the vast
- 09:54 --> 09:57majority of patients who present
- 09:57 --> 10:00with pancreatic cancer present at a
- 10:00 --> 10:02more advanced stage so talk
- 10:02 --> 10:04about the stage
- 10:04 --> 10:07distribution that you see in terms of
- 10:07 --> 10:09the proportion of patients who present
- 10:09 --> 10:12with early versus late stage disease and
- 10:12 --> 10:15what the implications are in terms of
- 10:15 --> 10:17prognosis.
- 10:17 --> 10:19People often think
- 10:19 --> 10:21about staging for cancer with the
- 10:21 --> 10:24usual stage one, 2, three or four.
- 10:24 --> 10:26When I think about pancreas cancer,
- 10:26 --> 10:28I really try to think about
- 10:28 --> 10:30it in terms of its
- 10:30 --> 10:33clinical presentations and so there are
- 10:33 --> 10:35patients that have resectable disease,
- 10:35 --> 10:38meaning that a surgeon could go in there at
- 10:38 --> 10:42the time of diagnosis and take it out.
- 10:42 --> 10:45There are patients that have locally
- 10:45 --> 10:46advanced but unresectable disease,
- 10:46 --> 10:48meaning that it hasn't spread
- 10:48 --> 10:51to other parts of the body,
- 10:51 --> 10:53but it's involving the nearby blood vessels,
- 10:53 --> 10:57and you can't safely take it out.
- 10:57 --> 10:59And then patients with metastatic
- 10:59 --> 11:02disease where it's spread to
- 11:02 --> 11:04other places in the body.
- 11:04 --> 11:07And so the the number or the percentage
- 11:07 --> 11:10of patients that can have surgery
- 11:10 --> 11:13at the time of their diagnosis
- 11:13 --> 11:16is really only about 15 to 20%.
- 11:16 --> 11:18It's a relatively low number
- 11:18 --> 11:21and the other 80% sort of evenly
- 11:21 --> 11:23distributed are either locally
- 11:23 --> 11:25advanced or metastatic disease
- 11:25 --> 11:29at the time of their diagnosis.
- 11:29 --> 11:34And so it was with my my friend who
- 11:34 --> 11:38was diagnosed with a locally advanced,
- 11:38 --> 11:40unresectable pancreatic
- 11:40 --> 11:43cancer that was encasing
- 11:43 --> 11:45important blood vessels,
- 11:45 --> 11:47so she certainly wasn't
- 11:47 --> 11:50a candidate for surgery at
- 11:50 --> 11:52the time of her presentation,
- 11:52 --> 11:56so it sounds like if patients are
- 11:56 --> 11:59fortunate enough to be resectable
- 11:59 --> 12:02at the time of their presentation,
- 12:02 --> 12:04would surgery be the
- 12:04 --> 12:06primary modality upfront?
- 12:08 --> 12:12That is a great question, and one that
- 12:12 --> 12:16we are still trying to figure out.
- 12:16 --> 12:18I think that there is clearly
- 12:18 --> 12:21a standard paradigm of doing
- 12:21 --> 12:23surgery followed by chemotherapy
- 12:23 --> 12:26for about six months afterwards.
- 12:26 --> 12:30There is a lot of interest in giving
- 12:30 --> 12:33chemotherapy prior to surgery or
- 12:33 --> 12:35giving part of the chemotherapy,
- 12:35 --> 12:38then surgery, and then chemotherapy after.
- 12:38 --> 12:42And in fact, here at Smilow we have a
- 12:42 --> 12:46clinical trial which is really looking at
- 12:46 --> 12:49that question of perioperative chemotherapy.
- 12:49 --> 12:53How do patients do getting some of the
- 12:53 --> 12:55chemotherapy treatments before surgery,
- 12:55 --> 12:57and then some after?
- 12:57 --> 13:01And how that might compare to those who get
- 13:01 --> 13:04surgery 1st and then chemotherapy later?
- 13:05 --> 13:07And so this kind of brings
- 13:07 --> 13:09us to the question of, well,
- 13:09 --> 13:11how effective is the chemotherapy?
- 13:11 --> 13:12Because,
- 13:12 --> 13:14I can imagine that many of the
- 13:15 --> 13:17people who are listening to this
- 13:17 --> 13:19show are thinking,
- 13:19 --> 13:22if I have a cancer and you can take this
- 13:22 --> 13:27cancer out and you can get it out of my body,
- 13:27 --> 13:29for many people the simple
- 13:29 --> 13:32logic is that might be better
- 13:32 --> 13:33than having a chemotherapy,
- 13:33 --> 13:35which may or may not
- 13:35 --> 13:38work and they often have some
- 13:38 --> 13:41trepidation about cancer spreading
- 13:41 --> 13:44and then making it unresectable.
- 13:44 --> 13:46So how effective is chemotherapy
- 13:46 --> 13:51that we could potentially use it in
- 13:51 --> 13:53a neoadjuvant fashion to potentially
- 13:53 --> 13:57even shrink the cancer and get some
- 13:57 --> 14:01systemic control prior to resecting it?
- 14:02 --> 14:09So our newer chemotherapy regiments are
- 14:09 --> 14:11good, they're not great,
- 14:11 --> 14:15but they are good and they can shrink
- 14:15 --> 14:17the disease for some and control
- 14:17 --> 14:20the microscopic disease that might
- 14:20 --> 14:22be floating around for others.
- 14:22 --> 14:25I think that the challenge ultimately
- 14:25 --> 14:28is that even with surgery,
- 14:28 --> 14:31the risk of pancreatic cancer coming
- 14:31 --> 14:33back because it has already shed
- 14:33 --> 14:36these microscopic cells is very high,
- 14:36 --> 14:39and so by giving chemotherapy we are
- 14:39 --> 14:41hopefully attacking some of those
- 14:41 --> 14:44microscopic cells that are floating around,
- 14:44 --> 14:47but also making sure that putting
- 14:47 --> 14:50somebody through what would be a
- 14:50 --> 14:52very major operation is ultimately
- 14:52 --> 14:54the right thing to do.
- 14:54 --> 14:57So many complicating moving parts
- 14:57 --> 15:00in the management of pancreatic cancer
- 15:00 --> 15:03and we're going to learn much more
- 15:03 --> 15:06about all of that right after we take
- 15:06 --> 15:09a short break for a medical minute.
- 15:09 --> 15:11Please stay tuned to learn more
- 15:11 --> 15:13about pancreatic cancer with
- 15:13 --> 15:14my guest Doctor Jeremy Kortmansky.
- 15:14 --> 15:17Support for Yale
- 15:17 --> 15:19Cancer Answers comes from AstraZeneca
- 15:19 --> 15:21providing important treatment options
- 15:21 --> 15:24for various types and stages of cancer.
- 15:24 --> 15:27More information at astrazeneca-us.com.
- 15:27 --> 15:29This is a medical minute
- 15:29 --> 15:31about head and neck cancers,
- 15:31 --> 15:33although the percentage of oral
- 15:33 --> 15:35and head and neck cancer patients
- 15:35 --> 15:37in the United States is only
- 15:37 --> 15:39about 5% of all diagnosed cancers,
- 15:39 --> 15:41there are challenging side effects
- 15:41 --> 15:43associated with these types of
- 15:43 --> 15:44cancer and their treatment.
- 15:44 --> 15:46Clinical trials are currently
- 15:46 --> 15:48underway to test innovative new
- 15:48 --> 15:50treatments for head and neck cancers,
- 15:50 --> 15:52and in many cases less radical
- 15:52 --> 15:54surgeries are able to preserve nerves,
- 15:54 --> 15:56arteries and muscles in the neck.
- 15:56 --> 15:59Enabling patients to move speak,
- 15:59 --> 15:59breathe,
- 15:59 --> 16:02and eat normally after surgery.
- 16:02 --> 16:04More information is available at
- 16:04 --> 16:05yalecancercenter.org.
- 16:05 --> 16:08You're listening to Connecticut Public Radio.
- 16:09 --> 16:11Welcome back to Yale Cancer Answers.
- 16:11 --> 16:14This is doctor Anees Chagpar
- 16:14 --> 16:16and I am joined tonight by my
- 16:16 --> 16:19guest doctor Jeremy Kortmansky.
- 16:19 --> 16:21We're talking about pancreatic cancer
- 16:21 --> 16:23and Jeremy right before the break,
- 16:23 --> 16:26you had indicated to us that you really think
- 16:26 --> 16:29about pancreatic cancer in terms of staging,
- 16:29 --> 16:32as whether things are resectable at the
- 16:32 --> 16:34time of presentation or unresectable,
- 16:34 --> 16:36but not metastatic or metastatic
- 16:36 --> 16:38and sadly,
- 16:38 --> 16:4280% of patients or so fall into
- 16:42 --> 16:44the last two buckets.
- 16:44 --> 16:45And you know,
- 16:45 --> 16:47that's really unfortunate,
- 16:47 --> 16:50because what is the prognosis for
- 16:50 --> 16:52patients who have locally advanced
- 16:52 --> 16:55unresectable disease at presentation?
- 16:55 --> 16:58And what is the prognosis for patients
- 16:58 --> 17:01who present with metastatic disease?
- 17:03 --> 17:06For those patients who have advanced disease,
- 17:06 --> 17:08unfortunately we view those
- 17:08 --> 17:09as incurable cancers.
- 17:09 --> 17:15We can't make it go away and never come back.
- 17:15 --> 17:18For patients that have locally
- 17:18 --> 17:20advanced disease on occasion and
- 17:20 --> 17:22it's not the expectation,
- 17:22 --> 17:25but on occasion they have a
- 17:25 --> 17:28great response to the chemotherapy
- 17:28 --> 17:31and we can revisit that question
- 17:31 --> 17:34of surgery but without surgery,
- 17:34 --> 17:37ultimately, patients succumb to their
- 17:37 --> 17:41disease and the goals of our treatment
- 17:41 --> 17:43are to control the disease
- 17:43 --> 17:45for as long as possible.
- 17:45 --> 17:48Help people live as long as possible and
- 17:48 --> 17:51feel as well as possible knowing that
- 17:51 --> 17:54the disease can be symptomatic as well.
- 17:55 --> 18:00For people who are
- 18:00 --> 18:03listening to this and who may have had
- 18:03 --> 18:06friends or even seen celebrities
- 18:06 --> 18:08go through their own journeys
- 18:08 --> 18:12with pancreatic cancer,
- 18:12 --> 18:15when we say the goal is really
- 18:15 --> 18:18to try to control the cancer for as
- 18:18 --> 18:21long as possible and the quality
- 18:21 --> 18:23of life for as long as possible,
- 18:23 --> 18:24in some cancers
- 18:24 --> 18:26we've discussed on this
- 18:26 --> 18:28show,
- 18:28 --> 18:31medical management has come a really long
- 18:31 --> 18:33way such that even in those settings,
- 18:34 --> 18:37people live for a long time and
- 18:37 --> 18:40they talk about this being incurable,
- 18:40 --> 18:42but really making it more of a
- 18:42 --> 18:44chronic disease then something
- 18:44 --> 18:46that is imminently fatal.
- 18:46 --> 18:49Where are we in the spectrum of
- 18:49 --> 18:51pancreatic cancer towards getting to
- 18:52 --> 18:55oK, so I've got pancreatic cancer and
- 18:55 --> 18:58I know that I can't get rid of it,
- 18:58 --> 19:00but
- 19:00 --> 19:02I can live with it versus this
- 19:02 --> 19:05is something that
- 19:05 --> 19:08is more of an imminent concern.
- 19:10 --> 19:14It's still a very challenging disease and
- 19:14 --> 19:19there are for a lot of other cancers,
- 19:19 --> 19:23a lot of exciting new therapies and
- 19:23 --> 19:25targeted therapies and immunotherapy's
- 19:25 --> 19:28that have become available.
- 19:28 --> 19:29But for pancreas cancer,
- 19:29 --> 19:33the majority of patients are still treated
- 19:33 --> 19:36with versions of chemotherapy and
- 19:36 --> 19:39those chemotherapy drugs are modest.
- 19:39 --> 19:41There are some who are
- 19:41 --> 19:42exceptional responders.
- 19:42 --> 19:47People who do really well for a long time,
- 19:47 --> 19:50but for the majority of patients,
- 19:50 --> 19:53the survival is still only
- 19:53 --> 19:56measured in in months or years.
- 19:56 --> 20:00And doing better and finding better
- 20:00 --> 20:02therapies is of such great
- 20:02 --> 20:04importance for this disease.
- 20:04 --> 20:06I think we are really hoping
- 20:06 --> 20:09and trying every day to find
- 20:09 --> 20:12therapies that are better than what
- 20:12 --> 20:13we have currently.
- 20:13 --> 20:16Do we have any factors that can
- 20:16 --> 20:19predict who is going to respond
- 20:19 --> 20:21better to chemotherapy versus not?
- 20:24 --> 20:29So we are still trying to figure that out.
- 20:29 --> 20:33I had mentioned
- 20:33 --> 20:37this earlier, patients that have a BRCA
- 20:37 --> 20:41mutation or a similar type mutation,
- 20:41 --> 20:44we find that they are more sensitive
- 20:44 --> 20:47to platinum based chemotherapy.
- 20:47 --> 20:51So a drug like oxaliplatin or cisplatin.
- 20:51 --> 20:54And that we can see better responses
- 20:54 --> 20:57there that can sometimes last longer
- 20:57 --> 21:00than we might see with a patient who
- 21:00 --> 21:03doesn't have one of those abnormalities.
- 21:03 --> 21:07We know that there is a class of
- 21:07 --> 21:09drugs called PARP inhibitors,
- 21:09 --> 21:12which for this mutated population
- 21:12 --> 21:15can benefit from this targeted therapy.
- 21:15 --> 21:19At the end of the day, that only makes
- 21:19 --> 21:23up about 7% of the patients that we see.
- 21:23 --> 21:28So it's still not a not a big number and
- 21:28 --> 21:32we know about 1% have another abnormality,
- 21:32 --> 21:33called microsatellite instability,
- 21:33 --> 21:34for which immunotherapy
- 21:34 --> 21:36drugs have been helpful.
- 21:36 --> 21:40And so we always test for that.
- 21:40 --> 21:45But again, it's one out of 100 that we see.
- 21:45 --> 21:48So the majority of the patients that
- 21:48 --> 21:51we take care of are still treated
- 21:51 --> 21:54similarly with these more generic
- 21:54 --> 21:57chemotherapy programs with a strong
- 21:57 --> 22:00emphasis in trying to encourage patients
- 22:00 --> 22:02to participate in clinical trials
- 22:02 --> 22:05that can help us move the field.
- 22:06 --> 22:10And I want to get into
- 22:10 --> 22:13the clinical trials in a minute.
- 22:13 --> 22:15But before we get there,
- 22:15 --> 22:17if you're treated with standard
- 22:17 --> 22:20chemotherapy and all of the side
- 22:20 --> 22:22effects that go along with that,
- 22:22 --> 22:24knowing that you're
- 22:24 --> 22:27presented with a locally advanced,
- 22:27 --> 22:28unresectable or metastatic cancer,
- 22:28 --> 22:30what is really the efficacy
- 22:30 --> 22:32of these chemotherapies?
- 22:32 --> 22:35I mean, how do patients balance the risk
- 22:35 --> 22:39and the benefit of the therapy?
- 22:39 --> 22:41Is this something that for
- 22:41 --> 22:45some patients the therapy is
- 22:45 --> 22:47worse than the disease itself?
- 22:47 --> 22:50Or are these actually things that
- 22:50 --> 22:53are tolerable with more modern
- 22:53 --> 22:56day treatments and additional
- 22:56 --> 22:59factors that you can give patients?
- 22:59 --> 23:01And that has really been shown
- 23:01 --> 23:03to make a difference in terms of
- 23:03 --> 23:05both survival and quality of life.
- 23:07 --> 23:10My job is to make
- 23:10 --> 23:12the treatments tolerable.
- 23:12 --> 23:14When we we pick a regimen,
- 23:14 --> 23:17there are two common
- 23:17 --> 23:18regiments that we use.
- 23:18 --> 23:20We are already thinking about
- 23:20 --> 23:23what are the side effects that are
- 23:23 --> 23:26associated with those regimens and
- 23:26 --> 23:28whether the patient who's about
- 23:28 --> 23:30to receive it is going to be able
- 23:30 --> 23:33to tolerate it based on their age and
- 23:33 --> 23:35other medical problems that they may
- 23:35 --> 23:38have and when we give the treatments,
- 23:38 --> 23:42we do so very carefully and we pay
- 23:42 --> 23:45attention to those side effects to make
- 23:45 --> 23:49adjustments in the dosing or give
- 23:49 --> 23:51supportive medications to really
- 23:51 --> 23:53make it as tolerable as we can.
- 23:53 --> 23:57It's never a desired situation that the
- 23:57 --> 24:01treatment is worse than the disease.
- 24:01 --> 24:02And the reality is,
- 24:02 --> 24:05that for the vast majority of
- 24:05 --> 24:08patients when they do start feeling poorly,
- 24:08 --> 24:10it's more often the disease
- 24:10 --> 24:11than it is the treatments.
- 24:11 --> 24:14But we make sure we see patients
- 24:14 --> 24:16every time before they get their
- 24:16 --> 24:18treatments to review the side effects
- 24:18 --> 24:21and give the right medications and
- 24:21 --> 24:23give the supportive medications or
- 24:23 --> 24:25dose adjustments that we need to do.
- 24:26 --> 24:29And how do we know
- 24:29 --> 24:31that the chemotherapies are working?
- 24:31 --> 24:34Many patients ask about well are
- 24:34 --> 24:36you going to do more blood work?
- 24:36 --> 24:39Are there tumor markers?
- 24:39 --> 24:40How do you know?
- 24:40 --> 24:42Because you had mentioned that for
- 24:42 --> 24:45some patients who present
- 24:45 --> 24:47without metastatic disease,
- 24:47 --> 24:49that is unresectable that
- 24:49 --> 24:52potentially in some of those patients,
- 24:52 --> 24:54you can reassess whether they
- 24:54 --> 24:56may be candidates for resection.
- 24:57 --> 25:01The best way to follow the disease is
- 25:01 --> 25:05with imaging so usually a CAT scan.
- 25:05 --> 25:08Sometimes an MRI or a PET scan,
- 25:08 --> 25:10but usually a CAT scan gives us
- 25:10 --> 25:13the level of detail that we need,
- 25:13 --> 25:15including the relationship of
- 25:15 --> 25:17the tumor to the vessels nearby.
- 25:17 --> 25:19For those who have locally advanced
- 25:19 --> 25:22disease and there is a tumor
- 25:22 --> 25:24marker that we can use as well,
- 25:27 --> 25:29that can be helpful,
- 25:29 --> 25:31although sometimes it is not as
- 25:31 --> 25:34reliable as the scans and then also
- 25:34 --> 25:36really listening to the patient.
- 25:36 --> 25:39Patients can have symptoms that can be a
- 25:39 --> 25:42tipoff that something is getting better
- 25:42 --> 25:45or getting worse even before CAT
- 25:45 --> 25:48Scan tell you what's going on.
- 25:49 --> 25:52And back to
- 25:52 --> 25:55the story of my friend.
- 25:55 --> 25:58She had chemotherapy as you suggested,
- 25:58 --> 26:01and her tumor markers went down,
- 26:01 --> 26:02which was great,
- 26:02 --> 26:05but the imaging still showed that
- 26:05 --> 26:08she had unresectable disease.
- 26:09 --> 26:14She was quite happy to be done with
- 26:14 --> 26:18chemo and really didn't want to
- 26:18 --> 26:20do much more, but was certainly
- 26:20 --> 26:22interested in clinical trials.
- 26:22 --> 26:25So let's talk about clinical trials,
- 26:25 --> 26:27both in that setting,
- 26:27 --> 26:29after you don't respond
- 26:29 --> 26:31to standard chemotherapy as well
- 26:31 --> 26:33as clinical trials that might
- 26:33 --> 26:35be offered to patients upfront
- 26:35 --> 26:37as new therapies are developed.
- 26:37 --> 26:40So what are you most excited about?
- 26:43 --> 26:45I think it's interesting that you
- 26:45 --> 26:48say that, I find that when I talk
- 26:48 --> 26:49to a patient
- 26:49 --> 26:51about a clinical trial
- 26:51 --> 26:54sometimes they say to me, do you think
- 26:54 --> 26:56I'm ready for a clinical trial?
- 26:56 --> 26:59As if it's something that we wait
- 26:59 --> 27:01until we don't have other options,
- 27:01 --> 27:03and clinical trials are important at
- 27:03 --> 27:05every phase of someone's disease,
- 27:05 --> 27:07whether they are initially diagnosed
- 27:07 --> 27:09or whether they have progressed
- 27:09 --> 27:11on one or two prior therapies.
- 27:11 --> 27:14We are always trying to figure
- 27:14 --> 27:17out what's the best thing to do.
- 27:17 --> 27:20And so the clinical trials that we are
- 27:20 --> 27:22working on that we're excited about,
- 27:22 --> 27:25I think we are still trying to find a
- 27:25 --> 27:29role for immunotherapy in pancreas cancer,
- 27:29 --> 27:31the same as in other diseases
- 27:31 --> 27:33like lung cancer or Melanoma.
- 27:33 --> 27:36But it's been a challenge,
- 27:36 --> 27:39and so we are doing clinical trials
- 27:39 --> 27:41that are looking at immunotherapy
- 27:41 --> 27:44combinations as opposed to just a
- 27:44 --> 27:47single drug to see if it might be
- 27:48 --> 27:52better and we're looking at clinical trials that are
- 27:52 --> 27:55trying to attack not just the tumor itself,
- 27:55 --> 27:58but the scar tissue in the
- 27:58 --> 28:00environment around the cancer cells.
- 28:00 --> 28:03One of the challenging things about
- 28:03 --> 28:06pancreas cancer is that it almost builds
- 28:06 --> 28:08this protective shell around itself
- 28:08 --> 28:11that can potentially make it more
- 28:11 --> 28:14difficult for our treatments to get in,
- 28:14 --> 28:18and so looking at drugs that can potentially
- 28:18 --> 28:21eat away at that might help our
- 28:21 --> 28:23more standard therapies be more
- 28:23 --> 28:25effective.
- 28:25 --> 28:27Doctor Jeremy Kortmansky is an associate professor of
- 28:27 --> 28:29clinical medicine in medical oncology
- 28:29 --> 28:31at the Yale School of Medicine.
- 28:31 --> 28:33If you have questions,
- 28:33 --> 28:34the address is canceranswers@yale.edu
- 28:34 --> 28:36and past editions of the program
- 28:36 --> 28:38are available in audio and written
- 28:38 --> 28:40form at yalecancercenter.org.
- 28:40 --> 28:43We hope you'll join us next week to
- 28:43 --> 28:45learn more about the fight against
- 28:45 --> 28:48cancer here on Connecticut Public Radio.
Information
November 15, 2020
Yale Cancer Center
visit: http://www.yalecancercenter.org
email: canceranswers@yale.edu
call: 203-785-4095
ID
5885To Cite
DCA Citation Guide