Skip to Main Content
All Podcasts

The Role of ‘Forever Chemicals’ in Cancer Metastasis

Transcript

  • 00:00 --> 00:03Funding for Yale Cancer Answers is
  • 00:03 --> 00:06provided by Smilow Cancer Hospital.
  • 00:06 --> 00:08Welcome to Yale Cancer Answers
  • 00:08 --> 00:10with Doctor Anees Chagpar.
  • 00:10 --> 00:11Yale Cancer Answers features the
  • 00:11 --> 00:13latest information on cancer care
  • 00:13 --> 00:15by welcoming oncologists and
  • 00:15 --> 00:17specialists who are on the forefront
  • 00:17 --> 00:19of the battle to fight cancer.
  • 00:19 --> 00:21This week it's a conversation about
  • 00:21 --> 00:24the role of forever chemicals in cancer
  • 00:24 --> 00:26metastasis with Doctor Caroline Johnson.
  • 00:26 --> 00:28Doctor Johnson is an associate
  • 00:28 --> 00:30professor of epidemiology and
  • 00:30 --> 00:31Environmental Health Sciences at
  • 00:31 --> 00:33the Yale School of Public Health,
  • 00:33 --> 00:35and Doctor Chagpar is a professor
  • 00:35 --> 00:36of surgical oncology at the
  • 00:36 --> 00:38Yale School of Medicine.
  • 00:38 --> 00:40Caroline, maybe we can start off by
  • 00:40 --> 00:42you telling us a little bit more
  • 00:42 --> 00:44about yourself and what it is you do.
  • 00:44 --> 00:46For the past seven or eight years
  • 00:46 --> 00:49my main research interests have been to
  • 00:49 --> 00:51understand the metabolism of colorectal
  • 00:51 --> 00:53cancer and actually how this can
  • 00:53 --> 00:56relate to the prognosis of the patient.
  • 00:56 --> 00:57And one of the ways that we do this
  • 00:57 --> 01:00is actually by looking at those small
  • 01:00 --> 01:01differences between individuals
  • 01:01 --> 01:03that can actually influence their
  • 01:03 --> 01:05metabolism and their prognosis.
  • 01:05 --> 01:08So aspects such as the genetics of the
  • 01:08 --> 01:10tumour or an exposure that they may
  • 01:10 --> 01:13receive or even things like where the
  • 01:13 --> 01:15tumour occurs within the colorectum
  • 01:15 --> 01:17or even the sex of the individual.
  • 01:17 --> 01:19As we know this can also affect
  • 01:19 --> 01:21the prognosis of the patient.
  • 01:22 --> 01:26And so we can kind of
  • 01:26 --> 01:28understand that individuals may
  • 01:28 --> 01:30have different prognosis either
  • 01:30 --> 01:34based on genetics of the tumor or
  • 01:34 --> 01:36their environmental factors,
  • 01:36 --> 01:39their gender, etcetera.
  • 01:39 --> 01:41Talk a little bit more about
  • 01:41 --> 01:43how that translates into this
  • 01:43 --> 01:45metabolism of the cancer?
  • 01:45 --> 01:47Many of us, when we think about metabolism,
  • 01:47 --> 01:50we're thinking about our own metabolism,
  • 01:50 --> 01:53calories in, calories out, weight loss,
  • 01:53 --> 01:55weight gain, that kind of thing.
  • 01:55 --> 01:59Clearly tumors also have a metabolism in
  • 01:59 --> 02:03terms of how they grow and spread.
  • 02:03 --> 02:07Talk a little bit more about how those
  • 02:07 --> 02:11factors influence that metabolism.
  • 02:11 --> 02:13Yeah, that's a really good point actually.
  • 02:13 --> 02:17So when we talk about tumor metabolism,
  • 02:17 --> 02:19we're talking about specifically what
  • 02:19 --> 02:21is happening in those groups of cells
  • 02:21 --> 02:24that are growing within the the tumor.
  • 02:24 --> 02:26And as the the tumor starts to grow,
  • 02:26 --> 02:28it's actually very metabolically
  • 02:28 --> 02:32dependent for its ability to metastasize.
  • 02:32 --> 02:34So when the the primary tumor,
  • 02:34 --> 02:37so the initial tumor in the case of
  • 02:37 --> 02:39colorectal cancer is present in the
  • 02:39 --> 02:42colon or the rectum it actually starts
  • 02:42 --> 02:45to produce some small chemicals called
  • 02:45 --> 02:47metabolites that can be quite acidic.
  • 02:47 --> 02:50So this can increase the local
  • 02:50 --> 02:52environment of the tumor,
  • 02:52 --> 02:55increase its acidity by
  • 02:55 --> 02:57decreasing the pH and this can
  • 02:57 --> 02:58actually cause breakdown of the
  • 02:58 --> 03:01membranes in the tumor and
  • 03:01 --> 03:03the cell membranes and cause the
  • 03:03 --> 03:04cells to undergo intraversation so
  • 03:04 --> 03:07they can then do things like move
  • 03:07 --> 03:09towards a circulatory system.
  • 03:09 --> 03:10So that's very dependent on
  • 03:10 --> 03:12the metabolism of the tumor.
  • 03:12 --> 03:14And then again when they enter
  • 03:14 --> 03:16the circulatory system the
  • 03:16 --> 03:17individual tumor cells,
  • 03:17 --> 03:19they're bombarded with things
  • 03:19 --> 03:20like oxidative stress.
  • 03:21 --> 03:23So the metabolism of the tumor
  • 03:23 --> 03:26cells themselves change again to
  • 03:26 --> 03:29counteract this oxidative stress.
  • 03:29 --> 03:30And then when these tumor cells
  • 03:30 --> 03:32reach a new organ or a new site
  • 03:32 --> 03:34such as the lung or the liver in
  • 03:34 --> 03:36the case of colorectal cancer,
  • 03:36 --> 03:39they undergo this state of dormancy.
  • 03:39 --> 03:41And then they ramp up their metabolism
  • 03:41 --> 03:43again by taking in different
  • 03:43 --> 03:45nutrients from those new sites,
  • 03:45 --> 03:46so from the surrounding tissue
  • 03:46 --> 03:48in the lung or the liver.
  • 03:48 --> 03:51And then they start to produce
  • 03:51 --> 03:53things like nucleic acids and
  • 03:53 --> 03:55amino acids and proteins to survive
  • 03:55 --> 03:58and grow in that new site.
  • 03:58 --> 04:01So actually metabolism is really
  • 04:01 --> 04:03intrinsic to going from being
  • 04:03 --> 04:05in that initial primary tumor
  • 04:05 --> 04:08state to the metastatic state.
  • 04:10 --> 04:13And so that really interesting when
  • 04:13 --> 04:16we think about how these cancer cells kind
  • 04:16 --> 04:19of use different milieu that they may find
  • 04:19 --> 04:22themselves in to really take advantage
  • 04:22 --> 04:25of the system to grow and flourish.
  • 04:25 --> 04:27You know as you think about that,
  • 04:27 --> 04:29some of our listeners may be thinking
  • 04:29 --> 04:31about how do you counteract that.
  • 04:32 --> 04:36And I think some of this then
  • 04:36 --> 04:39leads to people having perceptions
  • 04:39 --> 04:42that may or may not be true.
  • 04:42 --> 04:44So for example,
  • 04:44 --> 04:46when we think about cancer cells,
  • 04:46 --> 04:51as you mentioned, initially creating a
  • 04:51 --> 04:54acidic environment where they can then
  • 04:54 --> 04:57migrate towards the circulatory system,
  • 04:57 --> 04:58some people might think,
  • 04:58 --> 05:01well then that's a good reason to try to,
  • 05:01 --> 05:02for example,
  • 05:02 --> 05:06drink alkaline water or try to
  • 05:06 --> 05:09alkalinize your system so that cancer
  • 05:09 --> 05:12cells then don't grow and spread.
  • 05:12 --> 05:15Is there any fact to that?
  • 05:15 --> 05:17Is there any weight to that
  • 05:17 --> 05:18kind of an argument?
  • 05:19 --> 05:20Yeah, that is a really good point.
  • 05:20 --> 05:23And in this case,
  • 05:23 --> 05:26I don't think that would work.
  • 05:26 --> 05:28I think because
  • 05:28 --> 05:30there's many different aspects as
  • 05:30 --> 05:32well that can control the local
  • 05:32 --> 05:34environment within the tumor.
  • 05:34 --> 05:35So some of these
  • 05:35 --> 05:37are due to the genetic make up
  • 05:37 --> 05:39of the tumor that
  • 05:39 --> 05:41can control the expression of
  • 05:41 --> 05:44proteins that control how these
  • 05:44 --> 05:46metabolites are actually produced.
  • 05:46 --> 05:48And there's other aspects as well,
  • 05:49 --> 05:51such as the presence of the microbiome,
  • 05:52 --> 05:53which we know that there are thousands
  • 05:53 --> 05:54of different species.
  • 05:54 --> 05:57They all have their own genome and
  • 05:57 --> 05:59they can produce and metabolise
  • 05:59 --> 06:01various metabolites as well and
  • 06:01 --> 06:03control this local environment.
  • 06:03 --> 06:07So it really is a complicated
  • 06:07 --> 06:10mix of various factors that
  • 06:10 --> 06:12can influence the metabolism
  • 06:12 --> 06:15within the colorectum itself
  • 06:15 --> 06:17and things that you may ingest
  • 06:17 --> 06:19obviously go through various processes
  • 06:19 --> 06:21in your body to actually
  • 06:21 --> 06:24reach that area of the colon.
  • 06:25 --> 06:27So direct ingestion of something
  • 06:27 --> 06:29like alkaline water I wouldn't
  • 06:29 --> 06:30expect would
  • 06:30 --> 06:31affect an acidic environment,
  • 06:31 --> 06:34within the the tumor itself.
  • 06:35 --> 06:40So let's dive a bit more into your research
  • 06:40 --> 06:43that hopefully will be more impactful.
  • 06:43 --> 06:46Talk a little bit more about how
  • 06:46 --> 06:48your study of this metabolism,
  • 06:48 --> 06:50what exactly you're doing in your
  • 06:50 --> 06:53lab and how you hope that
  • 06:53 --> 06:55that will then lead to meaningful
  • 06:55 --> 06:57impacts for patients long term.
  • 06:58 --> 07:00We're trying to look at
  • 07:00 --> 07:02all these different
  • 07:02 --> 07:06aspects of individuals such as
  • 07:06 --> 07:07we've done a lot of research
  • 07:07 --> 07:08so far on
  • 07:08 --> 07:10whether the sex of the patient
  • 07:10 --> 07:13can influence prognosis
  • 07:13 --> 07:15and other aspects too.
  • 07:15 --> 07:18And the way that we look at
  • 07:18 --> 07:21this is by using a technology called
  • 07:21 --> 07:24mass spectrometry based metabolomics.
  • 07:24 --> 07:27And what we do here is that
  • 07:27 --> 07:29we take the tumor samples from individuals.
  • 07:29 --> 07:33So our very first study actually looked
  • 07:33 --> 07:36at 200 different tumor tissues from
  • 07:36 --> 07:39males and females and we analyze each
  • 07:39 --> 07:42of these tumors to see what their
  • 07:43 --> 07:44metabolism look like.
  • 07:44 --> 07:46So all the individual metabolites
  • 07:46 --> 07:47that were present.
  • 07:47 --> 07:49So we take these tumor samples
  • 07:49 --> 07:51and we use this technology called
  • 07:51 --> 07:53liquid chromatography based
  • 07:53 --> 07:55mass spectrometry metabolomics.
  • 07:55 --> 07:58And this essentially is like using a giant
  • 07:58 --> 08:00molecular sieve and a weighing scale.
  • 08:01 --> 08:02And it can give chemical information
  • 08:02 --> 08:05on the thousands of different small
  • 08:05 --> 08:07molecules or chemicals or metabolites
  • 08:07 --> 08:09that are present within each tumor.
  • 08:09 --> 08:11And these metabolites can come
  • 08:11 --> 08:12from things like
  • 08:12 --> 08:14your diet, from different
  • 08:14 --> 08:15environmental exposures.
  • 08:15 --> 08:17If they're at a high enough level,
  • 08:17 --> 08:19we can tell about different aspects
  • 08:19 --> 08:21of microbial metabolism as well.
  • 08:21 --> 08:23And we look at all of these
  • 08:23 --> 08:25metabolites together as
  • 08:25 --> 08:27as they do have some dependency
  • 08:27 --> 08:30on each other and we can predict
  • 08:30 --> 08:32what biological effects these
  • 08:32 --> 08:34metabolites could be having.
  • 08:34 --> 08:36And I guess one analogy that I like
  • 08:36 --> 08:39to think about when I'm thinking
  • 08:39 --> 08:41of metabolites and how they link
  • 08:41 --> 08:43to biology is kind of like the
  • 08:43 --> 08:45New York City subway system.
  • 08:45 --> 08:48So we know that the New York City subway
  • 08:48 --> 08:50system has various different train
  • 08:50 --> 08:52lines and each of these train lines
  • 08:52 --> 08:54has specific subway stations along
  • 08:54 --> 08:56them and we know which train lines go
  • 08:56 --> 08:58along which to which subway stations.
  • 08:58 --> 09:00It's the same with metabolism.
  • 09:00 --> 09:02So if we think of each of these train
  • 09:02 --> 09:04lines as metabolic pathways and each of
  • 09:04 --> 09:06these subway stations as metabolites,
  • 09:06 --> 09:08we know which metabolites are linked
  • 09:08 --> 09:10to certain metabolic pathways that
  • 09:10 --> 09:12control metabolism and control biology.
  • 09:12 --> 09:17So things like controlling oxidative stress,
  • 09:17 --> 09:19producing energy,
  • 09:19 --> 09:20controlling fat metabolism
  • 09:20 --> 09:21and things like that.
  • 09:21 --> 09:23So then we start to put together a
  • 09:23 --> 09:25picture of how certain factors such
  • 09:25 --> 09:28as the influence of an exposure
  • 09:28 --> 09:30or the sex of the individual can
  • 09:30 --> 09:32alter these aspects of biology and
  • 09:32 --> 09:34can be health indicators for us.
  • 09:36 --> 09:38And that really interesting
  • 09:38 --> 09:41and important work in the sense that,
  • 09:41 --> 09:43you know, if you're finding that there
  • 09:43 --> 09:46are differences based on gender in
  • 09:46 --> 09:48terms of these metabolites, then by
  • 09:48 --> 09:50definition that means that the biology,
  • 09:50 --> 09:54how men and women, their biologic systems
  • 09:54 --> 09:58process these metabolites is different.
  • 09:58 --> 10:01And so that has really profound implications,
  • 10:01 --> 10:04not only in terms of the differences,
  • 10:04 --> 10:06in terms of the rate at which
  • 10:06 --> 10:08men and women get cancers,
  • 10:08 --> 10:09but potentially in terms of
  • 10:09 --> 10:11how they're treated as well.
  • 10:11 --> 10:11Is that right?
  • 10:12 --> 10:14Yeah, that is correct.
  • 10:14 --> 10:15And in colorectal cancer,
  • 10:15 --> 10:17to my knowledge, I'm not a clinician.
  • 10:17 --> 10:21I'm a basic science researcher,
  • 10:21 --> 10:24is that men and women aren't stratified
  • 10:25 --> 10:26by sex for treatment.
  • 10:26 --> 10:29And there have been a couple of
  • 10:29 --> 10:32publications that I saw over the past year
  • 10:32 --> 10:35where they've seen that men and women have
  • 10:35 --> 10:37different outcomes when they receive
  • 10:37 --> 10:39the same type of chemotherapeutics.
  • 10:39 --> 10:41So using combination chemotherapeutics,
  • 10:41 --> 10:44one study saw that the female
  • 10:44 --> 10:46patients actually had a poorer
  • 10:46 --> 10:48prognosis than the male patients.
  • 10:48 --> 10:49And this is probably
  • 10:49 --> 10:51a combination of
  • 10:51 --> 10:54metabolism and immune responses.
  • 10:54 --> 10:56So yes, there's definitely
  • 10:56 --> 10:58a difference that we see,
  • 10:58 --> 11:00and in terms of
  • 11:00 --> 11:01incidence and mortality,
  • 11:02 --> 11:04males generally have a higher incidence
  • 11:04 --> 11:06and mortality from colorectal cancer.
  • 11:06 --> 11:08But for women, for colorectal cancer
  • 11:09 --> 11:11it is still the third leading cause
  • 11:11 --> 11:13of cancer related deaths for them.
  • 11:13 --> 11:17So it is still very important I think to
  • 11:17 --> 11:20study both males and females separately,
  • 11:20 --> 11:22in terms of colorectal cancer,
  • 11:23 --> 11:26and I think
  • 11:26 --> 11:29we've seen similar things in terms
  • 11:29 --> 11:31of research looking at gender
  • 11:31 --> 11:33differences even in things like heart
  • 11:33 --> 11:35disease where initially all of the
  • 11:35 --> 11:37trials were done using white males.
  • 11:37 --> 11:40And what we then discovered was that
  • 11:40 --> 11:43men and women are different in terms
  • 11:43 --> 11:45of their cardiovascular health.
  • 11:45 --> 11:48And that's why I think it's so important
  • 11:48 --> 11:51that we try to get a diversity of people
  • 11:51 --> 11:53to participate in clinical trials
  • 11:53 --> 11:56so that we really can understand the
  • 11:56 --> 11:58biology of different particular
  • 11:58 --> 12:02groups who may have different biologies.
  • 12:04 --> 12:07I think that certainly
  • 12:07 --> 12:10might be an area for further work.
  • 12:10 --> 12:12I know you're not a clinician,
  • 12:14 --> 12:17but thinking about how different drugs
  • 12:17 --> 12:19get metabolized in men versus women,
  • 12:19 --> 12:22how different drugs might
  • 12:22 --> 12:26affect the immune system in different
  • 12:26 --> 12:29people may actually potentially have an
  • 12:29 --> 12:32impact in terms of how they're treated.
  • 12:32 --> 12:34Is that kind of where your
  • 12:34 --> 12:37research is heading in terms of
  • 12:37 --> 12:38highlighting these differences?
  • 12:39 --> 12:40Yeah, exactly.
  • 12:40 --> 12:43And you know, some of the research
  • 12:43 --> 12:46that we're doing at the moment is
  • 12:46 --> 12:49actually looking at some of the
  • 12:49 --> 12:52in vitro data that has
  • 12:52 --> 12:54been generated on the
  • 12:54 --> 12:56genomes of various different colorectal
  • 12:56 --> 12:58cancer cell lines that come from males
  • 12:58 --> 13:01and females and looking at how the
  • 13:01 --> 13:03drugs can actually work in these cell lines.
  • 13:03 --> 13:06And we do see that there are sex differences
  • 13:06 --> 13:09in how effective these drugs may be.
  • 13:09 --> 13:12So my PHD student we have in the lab
  • 13:12 --> 13:15is currently working on this as part
  • 13:15 --> 13:17of her dissertation, thesis.
  • 13:17 --> 13:19But you know,
  • 13:19 --> 13:21what we hope to do is to then translate
  • 13:21 --> 13:23these findings that we have in the
  • 13:23 --> 13:25cell lines eventually into looking at,
  • 13:25 --> 13:28you know, if we see the same effect in
  • 13:28 --> 13:30patients by sex and gender as well.
  • 13:31 --> 13:33Fantastic. Well, we're going to take
  • 13:33 --> 13:35a short break for a medical minute.
  • 13:35 --> 13:36But please stay tuned
  • 13:36 --> 13:39to learn more about the role of forever
  • 13:39 --> 13:40chemicals and cancer metastasis,
  • 13:40 --> 13:43a topic we'll get more into right
  • 13:43 --> 13:45after the break with my guest,
  • 13:45 --> 13:46Doctor Caroline Johnson.
  • 13:46 --> 13:48Funding for Yale Cancer Answers
  • 13:48 --> 13:50comes from Smilow Cancer Hospital,
  • 13:50 --> 13:53where all patients have access to
  • 13:53 --> 13:55cutting edge clinical trials at several
  • 13:55 --> 13:57convenient locations throughout the region.
  • 13:57 --> 14:02To learn more, visit smilowcancerhospital.org.
  • 14:02 --> 14:04It's estimated that over 240,000
  • 14:04 --> 14:07men in the US will be diagnosed
  • 14:07 --> 14:09with prostate cancer this year,
  • 14:09 --> 14:11with over 3000 new cases being
  • 14:11 --> 14:13identified here in Connecticut.
  • 14:13 --> 14:15One in eight American men will
  • 14:15 --> 14:16develop prostate cancer in
  • 14:16 --> 14:18the course of his lifetime.
  • 14:18 --> 14:20Major advances in the detection and
  • 14:20 --> 14:22treatment of prostate cancer have
  • 14:22 --> 14:23dramatically decreased the number
  • 14:23 --> 14:25of men who die from the disease.
  • 14:25 --> 14:27Screening can be performed quickly
  • 14:27 --> 14:29and easily in a physician's
  • 14:29 --> 14:31office using two simple tests,
  • 14:31 --> 14:33a physical exam and a blood test.
  • 14:33 --> 14:35Clinical trials are currently
  • 14:35 --> 14:37underway at federally designated
  • 14:37 --> 14:38comprehensive Cancer Centers,
  • 14:38 --> 14:40such as Yale Cancer Center
  • 14:40 --> 14:42and Smilow Cancer Hospital,
  • 14:42 --> 14:44where doctors are also
  • 14:44 --> 14:45using the Artemis machine,
  • 14:45 --> 14:47which enables targeted
  • 14:47 --> 14:48biopsies to be performed.
  • 14:48 --> 14:51More information is available
  • 14:51 --> 14:52at yalecancercenter.org.
  • 14:52 --> 14:55You're listening to Connecticut Public Radio.
  • 14:55 --> 14:56Welcome
  • 14:56 --> 14:58back to Yale Cancer Answers.
  • 14:58 --> 14:59This is Doctor Anees Chagpar
  • 14:59 --> 15:01and I'm joined tonight by my guest,
  • 15:01 --> 15:03doctor Caroline Johnson.
  • 15:03 --> 15:07We're talking about the role of
  • 15:07 --> 15:10forever chemicals in cancer metastases.
  • 15:10 --> 15:12Before the break, Caroline,
  • 15:12 --> 15:15we were talking about the work
  • 15:15 --> 15:18that your lab is doing in terms of
  • 15:18 --> 15:20understanding cancer metabolism,
  • 15:20 --> 15:24how these cancers kind of use energy
  • 15:24 --> 15:27and various metabolites to really,
  • 15:27 --> 15:29you know, do their work as it were
  • 15:29 --> 15:32and the differences that we see
  • 15:32 --> 15:34in different populations based on
  • 15:34 --> 15:36either gender or exposures, etcetera.
  • 15:36 --> 15:39Now one of the things that your
  • 15:39 --> 15:42lab has been looking at is this
  • 15:42 --> 15:44concept of forever chemicals.
  • 15:44 --> 15:46Can you define what that is and
  • 15:46 --> 15:48talk a little bit more about
  • 15:48 --> 15:50the work that your lab has been
  • 15:50 --> 15:52doing looking at these?
  • 15:53 --> 15:55Yes. So forever chemicals are
  • 15:55 --> 15:58sort of another name for these
  • 16:00 --> 16:03polyfluoroalcohol substances or PFAS.
  • 16:03 --> 16:06And there's been a lot of media
  • 16:06 --> 16:08attention about these recently because
  • 16:08 --> 16:10they have been linked to various
  • 16:10 --> 16:12health effects including cancer.
  • 16:12 --> 16:14And what these are,
  • 16:14 --> 16:17are synthetic chemicals that have very
  • 16:18 --> 16:20strong carbon and fluorine atom bonds,
  • 16:20 --> 16:23which means that they're very difficult
  • 16:23 --> 16:26to break down and they stick around
  • 16:26 --> 16:28in the environment and in our bodies
  • 16:28 --> 16:29for a very long period of time.
  • 16:29 --> 16:31And they have been found in,
  • 16:31 --> 16:33you know, blood samples from
  • 16:33 --> 16:36humans and also in tissues as well
  • 16:36 --> 16:38such as the liver and the lung.
  • 16:38 --> 16:39And you know,
  • 16:39 --> 16:42they are the general sort of exposure
  • 16:42 --> 16:45that an individual may have that would
  • 16:45 --> 16:47come from potentially their drinking
  • 16:47 --> 16:50water or from dietary sources as they
  • 16:50 --> 16:52are used to make non stick surfaces.
  • 16:52 --> 16:54So you would find them perhaps
  • 16:54 --> 16:56on a non stick frying pan.
  • 16:56 --> 16:58They are present on the inside
  • 16:58 --> 17:00of microwave popcorn.
  • 17:00 --> 17:02They're even present on waterproof cosmetics
  • 17:02 --> 17:06and in some types of dental flosses as well.
  • 17:06 --> 17:08And there is also greater concern for
  • 17:08 --> 17:10those who may be occupationally exposed,
  • 17:10 --> 17:11such as firefighters,
  • 17:11 --> 17:14as it's present in the firefighting
  • 17:14 --> 17:15foam as well.
  • 17:15 --> 17:17And it really is unfortunately,
  • 17:17 --> 17:20you know, everywhere in our supplies
  • 17:21 --> 17:26So they are for me an area that I've
  • 17:26 --> 17:28been wanting to look into because
  • 17:28 --> 17:30they have had this link to cancer,
  • 17:30 --> 17:31particularly kidney cancer,
  • 17:31 --> 17:33but there have been some studies
  • 17:33 --> 17:35that have shown that they are
  • 17:35 --> 17:38also linked to certain types of
  • 17:38 --> 17:39inflammatory bowel diseases.
  • 17:39 --> 17:42So we were interested to look to
  • 17:42 --> 17:44see if any of these chemicals have
  • 17:44 --> 17:46been linked to colorectal cancer
  • 17:46 --> 17:49etiology or in more so in prognosis
  • 17:49 --> 17:52of the patient as we know they could
  • 17:52 --> 17:54be linked to metabolic effects
  • 17:54 --> 17:56and also immune system effects.
  • 17:56 --> 17:58And in the literature we had
  • 17:58 --> 18:00a deep dive into the literature
  • 18:00 --> 18:02of the link between PFAS,
  • 18:02 --> 18:04these forever chemicals, and colorectal
  • 18:04 --> 18:06cancer as part of a project by an
  • 18:06 --> 18:09MPH student in our lab last year.
  • 18:09 --> 18:10And we found there was very few
  • 18:10 --> 18:12papers that had looked at this
  • 18:12 --> 18:14association and when they had looked
  • 18:14 --> 18:16at the association there was very
  • 18:16 --> 18:17contradictory findings in the literature.
  • 18:17 --> 18:19So this is something we wanted
  • 18:19 --> 18:20to look into within our
  • 18:20 --> 18:22samples in vitro
  • 18:22 --> 18:24at the moment to see if there
  • 18:24 --> 18:25was any potential effects.
  • 18:27 --> 18:29So, tell us more about that.
  • 18:29 --> 18:31What did you find?
  • 18:31 --> 18:34I mean clearly when you start
  • 18:34 --> 18:36talking about these chemicals that
  • 18:36 --> 18:38are very difficult to break down,
  • 18:38 --> 18:39that hang around in the body
  • 18:39 --> 18:41for a long period of time and
  • 18:41 --> 18:43that are essentially everywhere.
  • 18:43 --> 18:45I mean we just think
  • 18:45 --> 18:47about what we've done this morning.
  • 18:47 --> 18:50We might have used a non stick
  • 18:50 --> 18:52frying pan to make some breakfast,
  • 18:52 --> 18:54put some coffee in the microwave
  • 18:54 --> 18:56and maybe last night enjoyed
  • 18:56 --> 18:57some microwave popcorn.
  • 18:57 --> 18:59We are ingesting these
  • 18:59 --> 19:01chemicals all of the time.
  • 19:01 --> 19:04So what are your data showing in
  • 19:04 --> 19:07terms of whether these chemicals
  • 19:07 --> 19:09actually get from these surfaces
  • 19:09 --> 19:13into our bodies and to what
  • 19:13 --> 19:15degree and more importantly,
  • 19:15 --> 19:19the link or lack thereof of these
  • 19:19 --> 19:22chemicals to the development of cancer?
  • 19:23 --> 19:26Yes, so the first set of experiments that
  • 19:26 --> 19:28we've done have been done in vitro.
  • 19:28 --> 19:29So these are cell lines
  • 19:29 --> 19:30that are grown in the lab.
  • 19:30 --> 19:32So we'd like to preface this that
  • 19:32 --> 19:34we haven't looked in human samples
  • 19:34 --> 19:36or in animal models right now to
  • 19:36 --> 19:38see if we see the same effect.
  • 19:38 --> 19:41But what we saw in the cancer cell lines
  • 19:41 --> 19:43was surprising and quite concerning.
  • 19:43 --> 19:46So we used 2 two of these chemicals,
  • 19:46 --> 19:47PFOS and PFOA,
  • 19:47 --> 19:50And they have actually recently
  • 19:50 --> 19:53been classified as class one and
  • 19:53 --> 19:55Class 2B carcinogens by IARC,
  • 19:55 --> 19:58which is an agency of the WHO.
  • 19:58 --> 20:00And what we did was to
  • 20:00 --> 20:02do a dose response study.
  • 20:02 --> 20:04So we took low levels and high levels
  • 20:04 --> 20:06of these chemicals and we applied
  • 20:06 --> 20:08them to colorectal cancer cell
  • 20:08 --> 20:11lines that were growing in the lab.
  • 20:11 --> 20:13And these cell lines were derived
  • 20:13 --> 20:16from a female patient and one of the
  • 20:16 --> 20:18cell lines contains AK res mutation
  • 20:18 --> 20:20that's commonly found in about
  • 20:20 --> 20:2340% of colorectal cancer patients.
  • 20:23 --> 20:25And so we don't see the cell
  • 20:25 --> 20:26lines with these chemicals.
  • 20:26 --> 20:28And the first striking observation that
  • 20:28 --> 20:31we made was that when these cell lines
  • 20:31 --> 20:32were given high doses of these chemicals,
  • 20:32 --> 20:35so those seen by potentially
  • 20:35 --> 20:36occupational exposure,
  • 20:36 --> 20:39so from a firefighter that these cells
  • 20:39 --> 20:41started to move away from each other.
  • 20:41 --> 20:43So it looked like they
  • 20:43 --> 20:44had increased motility.
  • 20:44 --> 20:46And at first we weren't sure whether
  • 20:46 --> 20:48this was something related to
  • 20:48 --> 20:50potentially increased growth of the
  • 20:50 --> 20:53cells or even death of the cells.
  • 20:53 --> 20:54But what we found was that the
  • 20:54 --> 20:56cell numbers were not increasing
  • 20:56 --> 20:57and the cells weren't dying,
  • 20:57 --> 20:58they were moving.
  • 20:58 --> 21:01So we wanted to validate this to make
  • 21:01 --> 21:03sure this was what we were seeing.
  • 21:03 --> 21:06So we repeated the experiment many times,
  • 21:06 --> 21:09but then we tried two different assays
  • 21:09 --> 21:11which can evaluate potential metastases.
  • 21:11 --> 21:14So one is called a wound healing assay and
  • 21:14 --> 21:17the other one is called a transwell assay.
  • 21:17 --> 21:19And what we found was that the cells did
  • 21:19 --> 21:22move when we applied these higher doses
  • 21:22 --> 21:25of PFOS and PFOA to the cell lines.
  • 21:25 --> 21:27And then we did two follow up experiments.
  • 21:27 --> 21:30One was at a protein level to see
  • 21:30 --> 21:32if there were known biomarkers of
  • 21:32 --> 21:35metastasis that were increased with
  • 21:35 --> 21:37or were changed with application
  • 21:37 --> 21:40of these PFOS to the cell lines.
  • 21:41 --> 21:43And indeed we did see these change as well.
  • 21:44 --> 21:45And then we looked at the metabolism
  • 21:45 --> 21:48of the cell line and we saw
  • 21:48 --> 21:50again when we applied PFOS and P4A
  • 21:50 --> 21:52to the cell lines that the metabolism
  • 21:52 --> 21:55changed in a way that indicated
  • 21:55 --> 21:58migration of the cells or metastasis.
  • 21:58 --> 22:00So all of these four things together
  • 22:01 --> 22:04sort of led us to the hypothesis that
  • 22:04 --> 22:06at high levels of PFOS exposure,
  • 22:06 --> 22:10it's possible that the colorectal
  • 22:10 --> 22:13cancer cells can migrate and metastasize.
  • 22:15 --> 22:18So a couple of questions there.
  • 22:18 --> 22:21So the first question is,
  • 22:21 --> 22:23it sounds like you were using
  • 22:23 --> 22:24cell lines that already had,
  • 22:24 --> 22:27for example, a KRas mutation,
  • 22:27 --> 22:30and that you were looking at cancer
  • 22:30 --> 22:32cells themselves and found that
  • 22:32 --> 22:35they were more likely to move when
  • 22:35 --> 22:38exposed to these chemicals in
  • 22:38 --> 22:41cell lines or in people who don't
  • 22:41 --> 22:44necessarily have a cancer already.
  • 22:44 --> 22:46Do these chemicals cause that
  • 22:46 --> 22:50kind of a cancer or is this really
  • 22:50 --> 22:53more so a risk of metastasis
  • 22:53 --> 22:56in people who already have cancer?
  • 22:57 --> 23:00So based on the findings in our research,
  • 23:00 --> 23:03the sort of only hypothesis I can make
  • 23:03 --> 23:06at the moment is that this would be an
  • 23:06 --> 23:09issue for those that already have cancer.
  • 23:09 --> 23:12I haven't seen,
  • 23:12 --> 23:15as I said initially, that
  • 23:15 --> 23:17the literature right right now surrounding
  • 23:17 --> 23:20the effects of these chemicals in
  • 23:20 --> 23:22colorectal cancer is really inconsistent.
  • 23:22 --> 23:25So at the moment we are concerned about
  • 23:25 --> 23:27how these chemicals could actually be
  • 23:27 --> 23:30causing the cell lines to metastasize
  • 23:30 --> 23:33because as you know at the
  • 23:33 --> 23:36latest stage that the cancer is at,
  • 23:36 --> 23:38the harder it is to treat.
  • 23:38 --> 23:40So we don't want to be having you
  • 23:40 --> 23:42know the tumors to get to the
  • 23:42 --> 23:45metastatic stage.
  • 23:45 --> 23:47And what we've seen as well through our
  • 23:47 --> 23:49results is that this could be
  • 23:49 --> 23:51potentially due to a number of things,
  • 23:51 --> 23:53it could be altering these
  • 23:53 --> 23:57proteins that could be initiating metastasis.
  • 23:57 --> 24:00We also see from some predictive models
  • 24:00 --> 24:03that it could be linked to inflammation
  • 24:03 --> 24:06and immune modulation as well.
  • 24:06 --> 24:09So there is definitely a lot for
  • 24:09 --> 24:10us to investigate.
  • 24:10 --> 24:12This has just been
  • 24:12 --> 24:14one set of cell lines and
  • 24:14 --> 24:16grown in the lab.
  • 24:16 --> 24:18So that's something that we are looking
  • 24:18 --> 24:21to investigate in the next year.
  • 24:22 --> 24:24The second question
  • 24:24 --> 24:27is with regards to the dose.
  • 24:27 --> 24:29So you had mentioned people or
  • 24:29 --> 24:32cell lines that were exposed to high
  • 24:32 --> 24:35doses of these chemicals had this effect.
  • 24:35 --> 24:37And so the question is,
  • 24:37 --> 24:40as you mentioned something that
  • 24:40 --> 24:43you would see more in people who were
  • 24:43 --> 24:45occupationally exposed like firefighters
  • 24:45 --> 24:48or is this something that
  • 24:48 --> 24:50we would see even in people who were
  • 24:50 --> 24:52exposed with all of the other ways that
  • 24:52 --> 24:55we are exposed to these chemicals.
  • 24:55 --> 24:57So for example,
  • 24:57 --> 24:59would you advise cancer
  • 24:59 --> 25:01patients who potentially have nonstick
  • 25:01 --> 25:04frying pans to get rid of their
  • 25:04 --> 25:06nonstick frying pans or not use the
  • 25:06 --> 25:09microwave or not have microwave popcorn.
  • 25:09 --> 25:13I mean what is the exposure related
  • 25:13 --> 25:16to those everyday exposures versus
  • 25:16 --> 25:18the occupational exposure?
  • 25:19 --> 25:20Yes, so as I mentioned,
  • 25:20 --> 25:23we looked at those lower doses as well.
  • 25:23 --> 25:25So those that are more environmentally
  • 25:25 --> 25:28relevant that an individual would be
  • 25:28 --> 25:30exposed to through drinking water and we
  • 25:30 --> 25:33didn't see that the cells were spreading,
  • 25:33 --> 25:35but some follow up experiments in
  • 25:35 --> 25:38our laboratory where we've looked
  • 25:38 --> 25:40at very low levels of now about
  • 25:40 --> 25:438 different types of PFAS
  • 25:43 --> 25:46what we've seen is that the cell
  • 25:46 --> 25:48lines are actually starting to grow.
  • 25:48 --> 25:51So they're starting to increase in number
  • 25:51 --> 25:55at these lower levels of exposure.
  • 25:55 --> 25:56But when we get to the higher
  • 25:56 --> 25:58levels of exposure,
  • 25:58 --> 25:59we don't see this cell growth,
  • 25:59 --> 26:01we see the cell motility.
  • 26:01 --> 26:04So what's kind of really fascinating
  • 26:04 --> 26:06about these chemicals and their effects
  • 26:06 --> 26:09in cancer is that they can actually to
  • 26:09 --> 26:11us in the lab appear to have different
  • 26:11 --> 26:14effects at low versus high levels.
  • 26:14 --> 26:16And I think this is something
  • 26:18 --> 26:20really important to investigate further.
  • 26:24 --> 26:26In terms of reducing exposure in general,
  • 26:26 --> 26:28I think as you mentioned about
  • 26:28 --> 26:31the non stick frying pans,
  • 26:31 --> 26:34these do tend to be coated in some
  • 26:34 --> 26:37of these PFAS chemicals and some of the older
  • 26:38 --> 26:40legacy PFAS have been
  • 26:40 --> 26:41removed but they've been replaced
  • 26:41 --> 26:43by other types of PFAS.
  • 26:44 --> 26:46My advice there would be to go back
  • 26:46 --> 26:48to using a a good old
  • 26:48 --> 26:52iron skillet and a seasoned skillet.
  • 26:52 --> 26:54That's what I use in my household now.
  • 26:54 --> 26:57It makes a really good fried egg,
  • 26:57 --> 26:59to try and reduce NOTE Confidence: 0.686547544
  • 26:59 --> 27:01exposure that way.
  • 27:01 --> 27:02But yeah,
  • 27:02 --> 27:04I think more knowledge in this area is
  • 27:05 --> 27:06really vital for cancer patients
  • 27:06 --> 27:08and I think it has been lacking.
  • 27:11 --> 27:14The other question is,
  • 27:14 --> 27:16if we step back and we look
  • 27:16 --> 27:19from an epidemiologic standpoint,
  • 27:19 --> 27:22have we seen the similar kind of effects?
  • 27:22 --> 27:25So are firefighters with
  • 27:25 --> 27:27colorectal cancer, for example,
  • 27:27 --> 27:30more likely to have distant metastatic
  • 27:30 --> 27:32spread than non firefighters?
  • 27:32 --> 27:35Do we have that kind of epidemiologic data?
  • 27:36 --> 27:39That isn't data that I'm aware of right now,
  • 27:39 --> 27:42but I think that's a really
  • 27:42 --> 27:44important thing to look into.
  • 27:44 --> 27:48There was a study out recently that I
  • 27:48 --> 27:51found was quite interesting and they saw
  • 27:51 --> 27:53that individuals that had been
  • 27:53 --> 27:56diagnosed with cancer such as uterine,
  • 27:56 --> 27:57ovarian, and melanomas,
  • 27:57 --> 27:59they did have high levels
  • 27:59 --> 28:01of PFAS in their blood,
  • 28:01 --> 28:03but it didn't specify in that study
  • 28:03 --> 28:05what their occupation was.
  • 28:05 --> 28:07But I think looking
  • 28:07 --> 28:08at firefighters it is
  • 28:11 --> 28:13really important to try and
  • 28:13 --> 28:15mitigate their potential
  • 28:15 --> 28:17exposure to these chemicals.
  • 28:18 --> 28:20Doctor Caroline Johnson is an
  • 28:20 --> 28:22associate professor of epidemiology
  • 28:22 --> 28:24and environmental Health Sciences at
  • 28:24 --> 28:26the Yale School of Public Health.
  • 28:26 --> 28:28If you have questions,
  • 28:28 --> 28:30the address is canceranswers@yale.edu.
  • 28:30 --> 28:33And past editions of the program
  • 28:33 --> 28:35are available in audio and written
  • 28:35 --> 28:36form at yalecancercenter.org.
  • 28:36 --> 28:39We hope you'll join us next week to
  • 28:39 --> 28:41learn more about the fight against
  • 28:41 --> 28:42cancer here on Connecticut Public Radio.
  • 28:42 --> 28:45Funding for Yale Cancer Answers is
  • 28:45 --> 28:47provided by Smilow Cancer Hospital.