Skip to Main Content
All Podcasts

Cervical Cancer Awareness Month

Transcript

  • 00:00 --> 00:03Funding for Yale Cancer Answers is
  • 00:03 --> 00:06provided by Smilow Cancer Hospital.
  • 00:06 --> 00:08Welcome to Yale Cancer Answers
  • 00:08 --> 00:10with Doctor Anees Chagpar.
  • 00:10 --> 00:12Yale Cancer Answers features the
  • 00:12 --> 00:13latest information on cancer
  • 00:13 --> 00:15care by welcoming oncologists and
  • 00:15 --> 00:17specialists who are on the forefront
  • 00:17 --> 00:19of the battle to fight cancer.
  • 00:19 --> 00:21This week it's a conversation about
  • 00:21 --> 00:24cervical cancer with Doctor Mitchell Clark.
  • 00:24 --> 00:25Doctor Clark is an assistant
  • 00:25 --> 00:27professor of obstetrics, gynecology,
  • 00:27 --> 00:28and Reproductive sciences at
  • 00:28 --> 00:31the Yale School of Medicine,
  • 00:31 --> 00:32where Doctor Chagpar is a
  • 00:32 --> 00:34professor of surgical oncology.
  • 00:36 --> 00:38Mitchell, maybe we can start off by
  • 00:38 --> 00:39you telling us a little bit more
  • 00:39 --> 00:41about yourself and what it is you do.
  • 00:42 --> 00:43Absolutely. I'm
  • 00:43 --> 00:45originally from Canada and I've been
  • 00:45 --> 00:47here at Yale now for four years.
  • 00:47 --> 00:50Prior to that at the University of Toronto,
  • 00:50 --> 00:52where a lot of my research in
  • 00:52 --> 00:53clinical activity was around
  • 00:53 --> 00:55cervical cancer prevention,
  • 00:55 --> 00:56awareness and obviously treatment of
  • 00:56 --> 00:58those diagnosed with the disease.
  • 00:58 --> 00:59Here at Yale
  • 00:59 --> 01:00I'm a gynecologic oncologist
  • 01:00 --> 01:03and part of a really robust
  • 01:03 --> 01:05multidisciplinary team caring for
  • 01:05 --> 01:07women with gynecologic cancers,
  • 01:07 --> 01:08including cervical cancer.
  • 01:09 --> 01:10So let's talk a little bit
  • 01:10 --> 01:12more about cervical cancer.
  • 01:12 --> 01:15Can you kind of paint us a broad
  • 01:15 --> 01:18overview of what exactly is the disease?
  • 01:18 --> 01:22How common is it?
  • 01:22 --> 01:24What's the mortality from it?
  • 01:24 --> 01:25I feel like a lot of us
  • 01:25 --> 01:27talk about cervical cancer,
  • 01:27 --> 01:29but we might not know the real details.
  • 01:29 --> 01:30Absolutely.
  • 01:30 --> 01:32We're very fortunate in this country
  • 01:32 --> 01:34to have seen a dramatic decrease
  • 01:34 --> 01:35in the rates of cervical cancer,
  • 01:35 --> 01:38both in incidence and mortality.
  • 01:38 --> 01:40And a lot of that has to do with
  • 01:40 --> 01:41our robust screening program.
  • 01:41 --> 01:44So many women are aware of the Pap smear,
  • 01:44 --> 01:46something that they talk very often
  • 01:46 --> 01:48with their gynecologists with and the
  • 01:48 --> 01:50design around that is to prevent these
  • 01:50 --> 01:52cancers and to detect them before
  • 01:52 --> 01:54they even have a chance to develop.
  • 01:54 --> 01:56And so women will meet
  • 01:56 --> 01:57with their gynecologist,
  • 01:57 --> 01:59have a Pap smear performed in a certain
  • 01:59 --> 02:01interval of time and we try to detect these,
  • 02:01 --> 02:02like I said,
  • 02:02 --> 02:04before we even develop into a cancer.
  • 02:04 --> 02:05Because of that,
  • 02:05 --> 02:07we've seen a real decrease in
  • 02:07 --> 02:08the rates of this disease.
  • 02:08 --> 02:11However, we do still continue to
  • 02:11 --> 02:13see patients present to the clinic,
  • 02:13 --> 02:15often those who are not up to
  • 02:15 --> 02:16date with their screening,
  • 02:16 --> 02:17not up to date with the Pap smear,
  • 02:17 --> 02:19who have unfortunately gone on
  • 02:19 --> 02:21to develop a cervical cancer.
  • 02:21 --> 02:22Often times though,
  • 02:22 --> 02:23these are still diagnosed at
  • 02:23 --> 02:25early stage because unlike many
  • 02:25 --> 02:27other gynecologic cancers,
  • 02:27 --> 02:29they often have a symptom and for
  • 02:29 --> 02:30many women that can be bleeding
  • 02:30 --> 02:32that is either irregular or out
  • 02:32 --> 02:34of sync with their menses,
  • 02:34 --> 02:35or bleeding in the post menopausal
  • 02:35 --> 02:37period when women have ceased
  • 02:37 --> 02:39having their menstrual period.
  • 02:39 --> 02:40Because of this,
  • 02:40 --> 02:42women present early where treatment
  • 02:42 --> 02:44options continue to be very
  • 02:44 --> 02:46favorable and for most women,
  • 02:46 --> 02:47they will experience a good
  • 02:47 --> 02:49outcome from their cancer care,
  • 02:49 --> 02:52meaning that we're able to treat these
  • 02:52 --> 02:53with curative, definitive intent.
  • 02:53 --> 02:53However,
  • 02:53 --> 02:56of course we will see and care
  • 02:56 --> 02:58for women who present with more
  • 02:58 --> 02:59advanced stage disease, and
  • 03:02 --> 03:03there have never been as many
  • 03:03 --> 03:05options now as there have been
  • 03:05 --> 03:06in the past to care for those
  • 03:06 --> 03:08women who unfortunately do come
  • 03:08 --> 03:08with advanced disease.
  • 03:10 --> 03:13So let's talk a little bit more about
  • 03:13 --> 03:16how we can detect
  • 03:16 --> 03:17cervical cancer early.
  • 03:17 --> 03:19Can you talk a little bit more
  • 03:19 --> 03:20about some of the guidelines
  • 03:20 --> 03:21in terms of screening?
  • 03:22 --> 03:24Absolutely. We're very fortunate that
  • 03:24 --> 03:27this is one cancer where there is robust
  • 03:27 --> 03:30data to support the use of screening.
  • 03:30 --> 03:31Unlike other cancers like ovarian or
  • 03:31 --> 03:33uterine where we don't have that data,
  • 03:33 --> 03:36the Pap smear has really been effective
  • 03:36 --> 03:38at detecting pre invasive disease or
  • 03:38 --> 03:40changes in the cells of the cervix
  • 03:40 --> 03:42before they develop into a cancer.
  • 03:42 --> 03:45One of the most important discoveries has
  • 03:45 --> 03:47been the association of the HPV virus in
  • 03:47 --> 03:50its development and role in cervical cancer.
  • 03:50 --> 03:53And so beginning all the way back in
  • 03:53 --> 03:55adolescence now we know it's important to
  • 03:55 --> 03:57offer vaccination to both boys and girls
  • 03:57 --> 04:01ages 9 to 11 to help prevent HPV infection
  • 04:01 --> 04:03and eliminate or dramatically reduce
  • 04:03 --> 04:05that risk of developing down the road.
  • 04:05 --> 04:07And so that data is very strong and
  • 04:07 --> 04:09supported by a number of different
  • 04:09 --> 04:11medical groups including Pediatrics.
  • 04:11 --> 04:14For those women who then either
  • 04:14 --> 04:16do or do not receive the vaccine,
  • 04:16 --> 04:18the guidelines for screening with the Pap
  • 04:18 --> 04:20smear are still the same at this time.
  • 04:20 --> 04:22That may change down the road,
  • 04:22 --> 04:25but for now we've come up with
  • 04:25 --> 04:26a combination test where we screen
  • 04:26 --> 04:29for both the HPV virus in the cells
  • 04:29 --> 04:31and the presence of any microscopic
  • 04:31 --> 04:33changes when our cytopathologists
  • 04:33 --> 04:35look under the microscope and if
  • 04:35 --> 04:37women have negative results from both
  • 04:37 --> 04:38the HPV and the cells,
  • 04:38 --> 04:40they're actually eligible to
  • 04:40 --> 04:43be screened every five years.
  • 04:43 --> 04:45And for a lot of patients and for
  • 04:45 --> 04:48women that has been a big change from
  • 04:48 --> 04:50what used to be an annual screening.
  • 04:50 --> 04:53But we know that the association of a
  • 04:53 --> 04:55negative HPV test with that screening
  • 04:55 --> 04:58confers a strong degree of protection
  • 04:58 --> 05:00over the course of the next five years.
  • 05:00 --> 05:02And so women can feel reassured that
  • 05:02 --> 05:04they have a very low likelihood of going
  • 05:04 --> 05:06on to develop a pre cancer or cancer
  • 05:06 --> 05:10of the cervix in the subsequent five years.
  • 05:10 --> 05:12In terms of detection though,
  • 05:12 --> 05:13and moving beyond screening,
  • 05:13 --> 05:15patients need to present to the
  • 05:15 --> 05:17gynecologist in the interim if they
  • 05:17 --> 05:18feel that they're developing any of
  • 05:18 --> 05:20those symptoms I talked about earlier.
  • 05:22 --> 05:25And so can you talk a little
  • 05:25 --> 05:26bit more about HPV vaccinations?
  • 05:26 --> 05:30I mean, it seems like we talk a lot about
  • 05:30 --> 05:33HPV in the association with cervical cancer,
  • 05:33 --> 05:36but some people might still be
  • 05:36 --> 05:38unaware about HPV vaccination,
  • 05:38 --> 05:40who should get it, when they should get it.
  • 05:40 --> 05:44And I understand that now the age guidelines
  • 05:44 --> 05:46for HPV vaccination have expanded.
  • 05:46 --> 05:48Can you talk a little bit more about that?
  • 05:48 --> 05:51Absolutely. This is one of my favorite
  • 05:51 --> 05:53topics because I think it's a unique
  • 05:53 --> 05:56example of a vaccine that can be thought
  • 05:56 --> 05:58of as a cancer prevention strategy.
  • 05:58 --> 06:00I think when this first came out
  • 06:01 --> 06:03in the early 2000s,
  • 06:03 --> 06:05there was a lot of reluctance around
  • 06:05 --> 06:07providing a vaccine that was associated
  • 06:07 --> 06:09with a sexually transmitted infection.
  • 06:09 --> 06:12However, we've seen just a dramatic
  • 06:12 --> 06:15reduction in HPV associated cancers in
  • 06:15 --> 06:18patients who use this vaccine early on.
  • 06:18 --> 06:21And so the ideal time to offer
  • 06:21 --> 06:23vaccination is really in that adolescent
  • 06:23 --> 06:26period prior to first exposure to HPV.
  • 06:26 --> 06:28And so we typically say between
  • 06:28 --> 06:30the ages of 9 to 11 and I
  • 06:30 --> 06:31would strongly encourage women,
  • 06:32 --> 06:32men, parents,
  • 06:32 --> 06:35grandparents, to have a very frank
  • 06:35 --> 06:38conversation with the pediatricians about
  • 06:38 --> 06:41ensuring that the HPV vaccine is included
  • 06:41 --> 06:44in the vaccine series for girls and boys.
  • 06:44 --> 06:46We know from some internal data in
  • 06:46 --> 06:49the state of Connecticut that the
  • 06:49 --> 06:51other vaccines recommended at 9 to 11
  • 06:51 --> 06:53have an uptake rate over 90%.
  • 06:53 --> 06:55But completion of the HPV vaccine
  • 06:55 --> 06:57series in our state remains very
  • 06:57 --> 06:59low at around 50 to 60%.
  • 06:59 --> 07:01And there's really no reason
  • 07:01 --> 07:02for this other than
  • 07:03 --> 07:05some misinformation and reluctance
  • 07:05 --> 07:07on providers and sometimes parents
  • 07:07 --> 07:10in seeing the benefit to the vaccine.
  • 07:10 --> 07:12Although I don't treat head and neck cancer,
  • 07:12 --> 07:14we are seeing a really robust set
  • 07:14 --> 07:16of studies coming out demonstrating
  • 07:16 --> 07:18the association of HPV with cancers
  • 07:18 --> 07:20of the head and neck.
  • 07:20 --> 07:23And just another reason to reinforce
  • 07:23 --> 07:25the parents and to children who are
  • 07:25 --> 07:26taking the vaccine that we should
  • 07:26 --> 07:28really look at this as a cancer
  • 07:28 --> 07:30prevention strategy as opposed to
  • 07:30 --> 07:32something that is associated with
  • 07:32 --> 07:33an infection that's acquired through
  • 07:33 --> 07:34sexual activity.
  • 07:35 --> 07:40The reluctance on
  • 07:40 --> 07:45people to take this vaccine I think is
  • 07:45 --> 07:45really concerning.
  • 07:46 --> 07:47And we've seen this not only
  • 07:47 --> 07:49in our own state as you mentioned,
  • 07:49 --> 07:53but even globally.
  • 07:53 --> 07:55And I think
  • 07:55 --> 07:58part of it is that
  • 07:58 --> 08:00parents may say,
  • 08:00 --> 08:03my child is not going to engage
  • 08:03 --> 08:06in premarital sexual activity.
  • 08:06 --> 08:09And so why should I vaccinate them
  • 08:09 --> 08:13between the ages of nine and 11?
  • 08:13 --> 08:15Can you talk a little
  • 08:15 --> 08:17bit more about about that?
  • 08:17 --> 08:18Absolutely,
  • 08:18 --> 08:21it's parents and it's also providers.
  • 08:21 --> 08:23We've done a lot of work internally
  • 08:23 --> 08:25here in the state of Connecticut.
  • 08:25 --> 08:27I work with the Department of Health on
  • 08:27 --> 08:30this in educating both our Pediatrics
  • 08:30 --> 08:32colleagues around ways to bring
  • 08:32 --> 08:34up these discussions with parents.
  • 08:34 --> 08:35There's a lot of
  • 08:35 --> 08:37people who still feel uncomfortable for some
  • 08:37 --> 08:40reason or another addressing a sexually
  • 08:40 --> 08:43related topic in a patient of that age.
  • 08:43 --> 08:46But the data really speaks for itself and I
  • 08:46 --> 08:49think changing the narrative like I said,
  • 08:49 --> 08:52to reinforcing this is to prevent a
  • 08:52 --> 08:55cancer far down the road.
  • 08:55 --> 08:58You know, we're not looking to provide
  • 08:58 --> 09:01some sort of assurance to adolescents
  • 09:01 --> 09:04that are having unprotected sex that it is safe
  • 09:04 --> 09:05because they're vaccinated.
  • 09:05 --> 09:07But really what we are looking
  • 09:07 --> 09:08at is the long game here,
  • 09:08 --> 09:10which is to prevent a cancer,
  • 09:10 --> 09:12a multitude of cancers actually,
  • 09:12 --> 09:14not just cervical cancer that
  • 09:14 --> 09:17could be really life limiting.
  • 09:17 --> 09:19And looking at the sort of long
  • 09:19 --> 09:21term investment of this very safe
  • 09:21 --> 09:23vaccine that has now been around
  • 09:23 --> 09:24for over a decade.
  • 09:29 --> 09:30If somebody is listening
  • 09:30 --> 09:32to this and they think, OK,
  • 09:32 --> 09:35I get it, but my child is now
  • 09:35 --> 09:38beyond the age of 9 to 11 and maybe
  • 09:38 --> 09:40they're in their late teens,
  • 09:40 --> 09:42maybe even their early 20s,
  • 09:42 --> 09:44can they still get the vaccine?
  • 09:44 --> 09:47Absolutely. We've got a great
  • 09:47 --> 09:49data set and clinical trials
  • 09:49 --> 09:51showing effectiveness in what
  • 09:51 --> 09:52we're calling the catch up cohort.
  • 09:52 --> 09:54So those are a group of people
  • 09:54 --> 09:56who did not have the opportunity
  • 09:56 --> 09:58or maybe chose not to take the
  • 09:58 --> 10:00vaccine in the earlier years
  • 10:00 --> 10:01when it's initially recommended.
  • 10:01 --> 10:04But we do still see statistically
  • 10:04 --> 10:06significant benefits in a reduction
  • 10:06 --> 10:08of HPV associated illnesses and
  • 10:08 --> 10:10cancers in those people taking the
  • 10:10 --> 10:12vaccine really up until their mid 20s.
  • 10:12 --> 10:14There is some new data to say
  • 10:14 --> 10:16that up until the sort of early
  • 10:16 --> 10:1840s there may be benefit,
  • 10:18 --> 10:20but it's quite individualized and the
  • 10:20 --> 10:22recommendation is for for people to
  • 10:22 --> 10:24discuss with their provider to see if
  • 10:24 --> 10:25maybe they would be a good candidate.
  • 10:25 --> 10:27But if we're looking at the
  • 10:27 --> 10:29cost benefit here or
  • 10:29 --> 10:30the risk benefit analysis,
  • 10:30 --> 10:32this vaccine is very safe.
  • 10:32 --> 10:34We don't see any major safety signals.
  • 10:34 --> 10:37This has been around for a long time and
  • 10:37 --> 10:39if you can confer any reduction in risk,
  • 10:39 --> 10:42I think it's a really worthwhile
  • 10:42 --> 10:44conversation for both these teens
  • 10:44 --> 10:46and 20 year olds to
  • 10:49 --> 10:50have with their doctors.
  • 10:52 --> 10:54Is the vaccine covered by
  • 10:54 --> 10:56most health plans?
  • 10:56 --> 10:58Yes, most health plans do cover this
  • 10:58 --> 11:01because it is recommended by both the
  • 11:01 --> 11:04CDC and many major organizations
  • 11:04 --> 11:07who make our sort of national
  • 11:07 --> 11:09guidelines around vaccination.
  • 11:09 --> 11:11And in the state of Connecticut for
  • 11:11 --> 11:13certain age groups it's covered as well.
  • 11:13 --> 11:15So these are things
  • 11:15 --> 11:16that you should definitely bring
  • 11:16 --> 11:17up with your pediatrician.
  • 11:18 --> 11:20And now we actually have a number of
  • 11:20 --> 11:22pharmacists and pharmacies that carry
  • 11:22 --> 11:24the vaccine and do not necessarily
  • 11:24 --> 11:27require the prescription of an MD.
  • 11:27 --> 11:28And so I think you certainly
  • 11:28 --> 11:30have that conversation with your
  • 11:30 --> 11:32trusted healthcare provider.
  • 11:32 --> 11:33And for those healthcare
  • 11:33 --> 11:34providers out there listening,
  • 11:34 --> 11:36I cannot reinforce enough the
  • 11:36 --> 11:38importance of your strong
  • 11:38 --> 11:40recommendation to parents and kids.
  • 11:40 --> 11:42We know that's the number one reason,
  • 11:42 --> 11:44or that is associated with vaccine
  • 11:44 --> 11:46uptake, is recommendation because
  • 11:46 --> 11:48you have that strong therapeutic
  • 11:48 --> 11:49relationship with your patients and
  • 11:50 --> 11:51their families and to either seek this
  • 11:51 --> 11:53through the clinic that you see that
  • 11:53 --> 11:55you get carrying or to see go to
  • 11:55 --> 11:56local pharmacy who has it in stock.
  • 11:57 --> 12:00Is the vaccine given in one shot
  • 12:00 --> 12:03or is it multiple shots that you
  • 12:03 --> 12:05require to get immunity?
  • 12:05 --> 12:08Great question. So it is designed to be a
  • 12:08 --> 12:10multi shot regimen depending on the
  • 12:10 --> 12:13age whether it will be two or three.
  • 12:13 --> 12:15Although we have seen some data
  • 12:15 --> 12:17coming out of countries that are lower
  • 12:17 --> 12:20middle income where access to a repeated
  • 12:20 --> 12:22series is not reasonable or feasible
  • 12:22 --> 12:25and there has been some very exciting
  • 12:25 --> 12:26results showing strong immunogenicity
  • 12:26 --> 12:29even if you just get one shot.
  • 12:29 --> 12:32Obviously we recommend patients get all
  • 12:32 --> 12:35two or all three depending on their age,
  • 12:35 --> 12:37but at least just getting the one
  • 12:37 --> 12:39seems to to confer some protection and
  • 12:39 --> 12:41that is long lasting at least.
  • 12:42 --> 12:44Can you clarify who gets two
  • 12:44 --> 12:46shots and who gets three shots?
  • 12:46 --> 12:47You mentioned that has
  • 12:47 --> 12:49something to do with age.
  • 12:49 --> 12:52So in the younger 9 to 11 population,
  • 12:52 --> 12:55the 2 is fine. Those of us in the catch
  • 12:55 --> 12:58up cohort who would be getting it in
  • 12:58 --> 13:00the early 20s would be the three shot.
  • 13:01 --> 13:04OK, so let's suppose you have a
  • 13:04 --> 13:07child who has gotten vaccinated.
  • 13:07 --> 13:09Do they still need Pap smears
  • 13:09 --> 13:12and HPV tests and if so,
  • 13:12 --> 13:13when should those start?
  • 13:14 --> 13:15That's a great question.
  • 13:15 --> 13:18For right now, we do not have any
  • 13:18 --> 13:19different guidelines for people
  • 13:19 --> 13:22who are vaccinated or unvaccinated.
  • 13:22 --> 13:24And the Pap smears usually start
  • 13:24 --> 13:26somewhere between 21 to 25.
  • 13:26 --> 13:28And we defer the HPV testing to
  • 13:28 --> 13:30around 30 just because we know
  • 13:30 --> 13:32this virus is so prevalent in
  • 13:32 --> 13:35the community and it takes many,
  • 13:35 --> 13:37many years for those cell changes to happen.
  • 13:37 --> 13:39So it can be a little complicated,
  • 13:39 --> 13:41but we have tried to make it as
  • 13:41 --> 13:43clear as possible for the
  • 13:43 --> 13:45family docs and gyns in the community.
  • 13:45 --> 13:46Perfect.
  • 13:46 --> 13:48Well, we need to take a short
  • 13:48 --> 13:49break for a medical minute.
  • 13:49 --> 13:51Please stay tuned to learn more about
  • 13:51 --> 13:53the care of patients with cervical
  • 13:53 --> 13:55cancer in honor of Cervical Cancer
  • 13:55 --> 13:56Awareness Month with my guest,
  • 13:56 --> 13:57Doctor Mitchell Clark.
  • 13:58 --> 14:00Funding for Yale Cancer Answers
  • 14:00 --> 14:02comes from Smilow Cancer Hospital,
  • 14:02 --> 14:04where the lung cancer Screening program
  • 14:04 --> 14:07provides screening to those at risk
  • 14:07 --> 14:09for lung cancer and individualized,
  • 14:09 --> 14:11state-of-the-art evaluation of lung nodules.
  • 14:11 --> 14:16To learn more visit smilocancerhospital.org.
  • 14:16 --> 14:18Breast cancer is one of the
  • 14:18 --> 14:20most common cancers in women.
  • 14:20 --> 14:21In Connecticut alone,
  • 14:21 --> 14:23approximately 3500 women will be
  • 14:23 --> 14:26diagnosed with breast cancer this year.
  • 14:26 --> 14:27But there is hope thanks
  • 14:27 --> 14:28to earlier detection,
  • 14:28 --> 14:29non invasive treatments,
  • 14:29 --> 14:31and the development of novel therapies.
  • 14:32 --> 14:33To fight breast cancer,
  • 14:33 --> 14:36women should schedule a baseline mammogram
  • 14:36 --> 14:38beginning at age 40 or earlier if they have
  • 14:38 --> 14:41risk factors associated with the disease.
  • 14:41 --> 14:42With screening,
  • 14:42 --> 14:43early detection,
  • 14:43 --> 14:44and a healthy lifestyle,
  • 14:44 --> 14:46breast cancer can be defeated.
  • 14:46 --> 14:48Clinical trials are currently
  • 14:48 --> 14:50underway at federally designated
  • 14:50 --> 14:51comprehensive cancer centers,
  • 14:51 --> 14:53such as Yale Cancer Center
  • 14:53 --> 14:55and Smilow Cancer Hospital,
  • 14:55 --> 14:57to make innovative new
  • 14:57 --> 14:59treatments available to patients.
  • 14:59 --> 15:01Digital breast tomosynthesis or 3D
  • 15:01 --> 15:04mammography is also transforming breast
  • 15:04 --> 15:06cancer screening by significantly
  • 15:06 --> 15:07reducing unnecessary procedures
  • 15:07 --> 15:10while picking up more cancers.
  • 15:10 --> 15:12More information is available
  • 15:12 --> 15:13at yalecancercenter.org.
  • 15:13 --> 15:17You're listening to Connecticut Public Radio.
  • 15:17 --> 15:17Welcome
  • 15:17 --> 15:19back to Yale Cancer Answers.
  • 15:19 --> 15:20This is Doctor Anees Chagpar,
  • 15:20 --> 15:22and I'm joined tonight by my guest,
  • 15:22 --> 15:23Doctor Mitchell Clark.
  • 15:23 --> 15:25We're discussing the care of
  • 15:25 --> 15:26patients with cervical cancer.
  • 15:26 --> 15:27Now before the break,
  • 15:27 --> 15:30we talked a lot about screening and
  • 15:30 --> 15:34prevention with HPV tests and Pap smears
  • 15:34 --> 15:37and the very important HPV vaccine.
  • 15:37 --> 15:39But Mitchell, now I want to pivot a
  • 15:39 --> 15:42little bit into patients who
  • 15:42 --> 15:45are found to have cervical cancer.
  • 15:46 --> 15:49Can you talk a little bit more about
  • 15:49 --> 15:51how cervical cancer is diagnosed
  • 15:51 --> 15:54and how is that diagnosis made,
  • 15:54 --> 15:58whether on a Pap smear or symptomatically?
  • 15:59 --> 16:01In general, we tend to detect
  • 16:01 --> 16:03these symptomatically because the
  • 16:03 --> 16:05Pap smear is really designed to
  • 16:05 --> 16:07detect precancerous changes where
  • 16:07 --> 16:09an intervention can be undertaken
  • 16:09 --> 16:11to prevent development into cancer.
  • 16:11 --> 16:13And so patients will often have
  • 16:13 --> 16:15some type of bleeding symptom or
  • 16:15 --> 16:17some pelvic discomfort or pain.
  • 16:17 --> 16:19But in general, there will be some
  • 16:19 --> 16:21bleeding either between the periods
  • 16:21 --> 16:22or in the postmenopausal period,
  • 16:22 --> 16:24which prompts an evaluation
  • 16:24 --> 16:26by the gynecologist.
  • 16:26 --> 16:27When patients go to the office,
  • 16:27 --> 16:29they can expect that their gynecologist
  • 16:29 --> 16:32will offer a pelvic exam with a speculum
  • 16:32 --> 16:34to visualize the cervix in order to
  • 16:34 --> 16:36see whether or not there's any obvious
  • 16:36 --> 16:38abnormality suggestive of a cancer.
  • 16:38 --> 16:41Very often a biopsy will be
  • 16:41 --> 16:42undertaken at that point,
  • 16:42 --> 16:44which can usually be accomplished in
  • 16:44 --> 16:46the office and that pathology and that
  • 16:46 --> 16:48result will help us better understand
  • 16:48 --> 16:50if those bleeding symptoms were
  • 16:50 --> 16:53related to a cervical cancer or not.
  • 16:53 --> 16:55And generally at that point,
  • 16:55 --> 16:57whether based on the suspicion of
  • 16:57 --> 16:59the exam or whether the gynecologist
  • 16:59 --> 17:01would like to wait for the results
  • 17:01 --> 17:02of the pathology,
  • 17:02 --> 17:04they'll then refer that patient on
  • 17:04 --> 17:07to someone like myself or our team
  • 17:07 --> 17:09within the GYN group in order
  • 17:09 --> 17:11to better understand the stage and
  • 17:11 --> 17:13treatment options for that patient.
  • 17:13 --> 17:15How are patients staged? I mean,
  • 17:15 --> 17:17is this a series of imaging tests?
  • 17:18 --> 17:20Exactly, we stage these
  • 17:20 --> 17:22patients clinically meaning we don't
  • 17:22 --> 17:24necessarily need to perform an operation.
  • 17:24 --> 17:27And in order to understand this stage,
  • 17:27 --> 17:29historically
  • 17:29 --> 17:31we would do exam under anaesthesia.
  • 17:34 --> 17:37But now we have really high quality
  • 17:37 --> 17:40imaging options and we partner with
  • 17:40 --> 17:42our radiology colleagues to generally
  • 17:42 --> 17:44perform an MRI and a PET scan.
  • 17:44 --> 17:46The MRI is important to better understand
  • 17:46 --> 17:49the size and local features.
  • 17:49 --> 17:51Local meaning within the
  • 17:51 --> 17:53cervix of the tumor and then the PET
  • 17:53 --> 17:56scan helps us ensure or detect any
  • 17:56 --> 17:58signs of metastatic disease outside of
  • 17:58 --> 18:00the primary tumor within the cervix.
  • 18:00 --> 18:03Once we have all of that information,
  • 18:03 --> 18:05we sit down as a multidisciplinary
  • 18:05 --> 18:07group and review those results
  • 18:07 --> 18:09and then we can better understand
  • 18:09 --> 18:12which options that would be best
  • 18:12 --> 18:13for each individual patient.
  • 18:14 --> 18:17Take us through the options,
  • 18:17 --> 18:20what on the table when it comes
  • 18:20 --> 18:22to treatment of cervical cancer.
  • 18:22 --> 18:23A lot of this depends on,
  • 18:23 --> 18:25you know, each individual patient,
  • 18:25 --> 18:27their age and what their goals are.
  • 18:27 --> 18:28And so, you know,
  • 18:28 --> 18:30we do unfortunately see some
  • 18:30 --> 18:31of these cancers occurring
  • 18:31 --> 18:33in women of reproductive age,
  • 18:33 --> 18:35perhaps those who have either not
  • 18:35 --> 18:38had an opportunity to carry a child,
  • 18:38 --> 18:39if that's within their family
  • 18:39 --> 18:41plan, or whether they're hoping to
  • 18:41 --> 18:43have more children down the road.
  • 18:43 --> 18:45But are faced with this diagnosis.
  • 18:45 --> 18:47So the first thing they understand is
  • 18:47 --> 18:49does this patient have an interest
  • 18:49 --> 18:51in preserving her fertility options?
  • 18:51 --> 18:53We do know that for certain cancer
  • 18:53 --> 18:56stages or sizes of the tumor
  • 18:56 --> 18:57and in certain patients,
  • 18:57 --> 18:59a fertility sparing approach is very
  • 18:59 --> 19:01reasonable and seems to have the
  • 19:01 --> 19:03same long term oncologic outcomes,
  • 19:03 --> 19:04which is important.
  • 19:04 --> 19:05Obviously that pregnancy would be
  • 19:05 --> 19:07considered high risk down the road and
  • 19:07 --> 19:09there may be some issues in getting pregnant.
  • 19:09 --> 19:11We've got many years worth of data
  • 19:11 --> 19:14now to so show that in certain women
  • 19:14 --> 19:16those options are reasonable and they
  • 19:16 --> 19:18do not have to compromise their
  • 19:18 --> 19:20oncology outcomes just for fertility.
  • 19:20 --> 19:22So it's been a very exciting advance
  • 19:22 --> 19:23in the field for those women who
  • 19:23 --> 19:25are not interested on preserving
  • 19:25 --> 19:27their fertility or may not have
  • 19:27 --> 19:28that option based on the results of
  • 19:28 --> 19:30those tests that we talked about,
  • 19:30 --> 19:31we then have to decide,
  • 19:31 --> 19:33is this a woman who would be
  • 19:33 --> 19:35best served with surgery,
  • 19:35 --> 19:36meaning radical hysterectomy
  • 19:36 --> 19:37to remove the uterus,
  • 19:37 --> 19:39cervix and tumor or do we think
  • 19:39 --> 19:42that this cancer will be best
  • 19:42 --> 19:44controlled with a combination of
  • 19:44 --> 19:45chemotherapy and radiation?
  • 19:45 --> 19:47And a lot of that depends on
  • 19:47 --> 19:49the size of the tumor,
  • 19:49 --> 19:50some of the information we get
  • 19:50 --> 19:52from the pathology in our exam,
  • 19:52 --> 19:53in the office.
  • 19:53 --> 19:57And so for women who do want
  • 19:57 --> 19:59to preserve their fertility,
  • 19:59 --> 20:01clearly the radical hysterectomy
  • 20:01 --> 20:04is not a viable option.
  • 20:04 --> 20:06So what does their treatment
  • 20:06 --> 20:08algorithm kind of look like?
  • 20:09 --> 20:11Right, so we do what is called
  • 20:11 --> 20:12a radical trachelectomy,
  • 20:12 --> 20:15which is a procedure to remove the cervix
  • 20:15 --> 20:18and the tissue surrounding the cervix.
  • 20:18 --> 20:19We also sample some lymph nodes
  • 20:19 --> 20:21at the same time to make sure
  • 20:21 --> 20:22that cancer has not spread.
  • 20:22 --> 20:24What we do then,
  • 20:24 --> 20:26after the cervix has been removed is
  • 20:26 --> 20:28reconstruct the uterus to the top of
  • 20:28 --> 20:31the vagina and place a device there
  • 20:31 --> 20:33called a circlage which helps prevent
  • 20:33 --> 20:36any dilation of the lower portion
  • 20:36 --> 20:38of the uterus during the pregnancy.
  • 20:38 --> 20:40It appears that this is a safe
  • 20:40 --> 20:42option for women who who want
  • 20:42 --> 20:43to choose this approach,
  • 20:43 --> 20:45but as you can imagine there will be
  • 20:45 --> 20:47some challenges with the fertility.
  • 20:47 --> 20:47I'm sorry,
  • 20:47 --> 20:49with the pregnancy and will need to
  • 20:49 --> 20:52be closely monitored by a high risk team.
  • 20:52 --> 20:54But it appears that this surgery can
  • 20:54 --> 20:57be performed safely from a vaginal,
  • 20:57 --> 20:59laparoscopic or even a traditional
  • 20:59 --> 21:01open laparotomy approach.
  • 21:01 --> 21:02And patients tend to
  • 21:02 --> 21:03do well in the long term.
  • 21:04 --> 21:07Is this a longer or more complicated
  • 21:07 --> 21:10procedure than the radical hysterectomy?
  • 21:10 --> 21:12Yeah, it can be a little bit
  • 21:12 --> 21:14longer and more complex.
  • 21:14 --> 21:17And that's why we certainly encourage
  • 21:17 --> 21:20patients to see a group or a team
  • 21:20 --> 21:22with expertise in this procedure.
  • 21:22 --> 21:25But for those who do undergo the surgery,
  • 21:25 --> 21:26they appear to have
  • 21:26 --> 21:28comparable oncologic outcomes and have
  • 21:28 --> 21:31gone on to carry children down the road,
  • 21:31 --> 21:33which is always exciting to see those
  • 21:33 --> 21:34pictures in the office when patients
  • 21:34 --> 21:35come back to see us and follow up.
  • 21:36 --> 21:40Yeah, I'm sure for the patients
  • 21:40 --> 21:43for whom fertility is not a major concern,
  • 21:43 --> 21:46you mentioned that there were two options.
  • 21:46 --> 21:48One was the radical hysterectomy and the
  • 21:48 --> 21:51other was chemotherapy and radiation.
  • 21:51 --> 21:53Are those two equivalent oncologically?
  • 21:54 --> 21:56That's a great point and I bring that
  • 21:56 --> 21:58up with my patients when I talk to
  • 21:58 --> 22:00them because they do appear equivalent.
  • 22:00 --> 22:02And what we're trying to do is
  • 22:02 --> 22:04identify patients who would not
  • 22:04 --> 22:06necessarily require adjuvant treatment.
  • 22:06 --> 22:09Meaning if someone is going to have surgery,
  • 22:09 --> 22:11we want to ensure that then after the
  • 22:11 --> 22:13surgery there's no indication to give
  • 22:13 --> 22:15radiation after because we know the
  • 22:15 --> 22:17toxicity and side effects are worse if
  • 22:17 --> 22:19patients need a surgery and then we
  • 22:19 --> 22:21know they need radiation in addition to that.
  • 22:21 --> 22:23So we try to pre select patients
  • 22:23 --> 22:25to either need one or the other.
  • 22:25 --> 22:26For some reason,
  • 22:26 --> 22:29patients often perceive radiation or
  • 22:29 --> 22:31chemotherapy as maybe not curative or
  • 22:31 --> 22:34I'm just trying to palliate this cancer.
  • 22:34 --> 22:35That is really not the case in
  • 22:35 --> 22:37cancer of the cervix.
  • 22:37 --> 22:39And we treat with a curative intent to
  • 22:39 --> 22:42make these cancers go away long term.
  • 22:42 --> 22:44So I try to help patients understand
  • 22:44 --> 22:47that we want to select an individualized
  • 22:47 --> 22:49treatment plan that is best suited
  • 22:49 --> 22:51for their individual scenario.
  • 22:51 --> 22:53And if that plan is radiation
  • 22:53 --> 22:54to chemotherapy,
  • 22:54 --> 22:56they should not feel that
  • 22:56 --> 22:57they're somehow being,
  • 22:57 --> 22:58you know,
  • 22:58 --> 22:59put into a category that will not
  • 22:59 --> 23:02have the same outcomes of a patient
  • 23:02 --> 23:03undergoing a surgical approach.
  • 23:04 --> 23:07So if they're equivalent, why would
  • 23:07 --> 23:10anybody do the radical surgery?
  • 23:10 --> 23:13For the smaller tumors,
  • 23:17 --> 23:19they have one operation that tends
  • 23:19 --> 23:21to be a little bit less in terms
  • 23:21 --> 23:23of toxicity to the other pelvic
  • 23:23 --> 23:25structures because radiation can
  • 23:25 --> 23:27have some side effects on the bowel.
  • 23:27 --> 23:29The bladder patients may experience some
  • 23:29 --> 23:32long term issues in terms of diarrhea
  • 23:32 --> 23:34or constipation or bladder irritation.
  • 23:34 --> 23:35In terms of toxicity,
  • 23:35 --> 23:37there certainly can be more toxicity
  • 23:37 --> 23:39with the radiation approach,
  • 23:39 --> 23:41but when looking at the long
  • 23:41 --> 23:42term oncologic outcomes,
  • 23:42 --> 23:43they appear equivalent for
  • 23:43 --> 23:46certain stages of this cancer.
  • 23:46 --> 23:48Obviously if we find on the PET
  • 23:48 --> 23:50scan that the cancer is spread
  • 23:50 --> 23:52outside of the pelvic area,
  • 23:52 --> 23:54then neither surgery or radiation
  • 23:54 --> 23:56are necessarily indicated.
  • 23:56 --> 23:58And we often choose a combination
  • 23:58 --> 24:01of chemotherapy and some of these
  • 24:01 --> 24:02newer agents like immunotherapy
  • 24:02 --> 24:04which many patients are asking about.
  • 24:04 --> 24:06And it's been very sort of present
  • 24:06 --> 24:09in the media and we're very
  • 24:09 --> 24:11excited to see that a lot of these
  • 24:11 --> 24:13immunotherapies and new drug
  • 24:13 --> 24:15developments are showing promise in cancer of
  • 24:15 --> 24:16the cervix as well.
  • 24:16 --> 24:18So I want to get to the drugs
  • 24:18 --> 24:20in a minute, but just to finish
  • 24:20 --> 24:22up the conversation with regards
  • 24:22 --> 24:25to fertility preservation and the
  • 24:25 --> 24:27different options for women who do
  • 24:27 --> 24:29want to preserve their fertility,
  • 24:29 --> 24:33is chemotherapy and radiation therapy an
  • 24:33 --> 24:36option if they choose to, for example,
  • 24:36 --> 24:40harvest their eggs or ovarian
  • 24:40 --> 24:42tissue prior to the chemotherapy and
  • 24:42 --> 24:44radiation and that way they could
  • 24:44 --> 24:46avoid the more complicated surgery?
  • 24:46 --> 24:49Absolutely. The retrieval of the eggs
  • 24:49 --> 24:51is certainly possible and we have
  • 24:51 --> 24:53a wonderful group of reproductive
  • 24:53 --> 24:54endocrinologists that we work
  • 24:54 --> 24:57closely with who get patients in
  • 24:57 --> 24:58quickly to stimulate an ovarian
  • 24:58 --> 25:01cycle and retrieve those eggs.
  • 25:01 --> 25:03Now, if patients go on to receive
  • 25:03 --> 25:04the radiation and chemotherapy
  • 25:04 --> 25:05after the egg retrieval,
  • 25:06 --> 25:07the uterus will unfortunately
  • 25:07 --> 25:09not be able to function in the
  • 25:09 --> 25:11capacity to carry a pregnancy.
  • 25:11 --> 25:13But patients would have the option
  • 25:13 --> 25:16to use those harvested eggs with a
  • 25:16 --> 25:18gestational carrier or surrogate to
  • 25:18 --> 25:21carry a child that is genetically theirs.
  • 25:21 --> 25:21But unfortunately,
  • 25:21 --> 25:24the radiation does do damage to the
  • 25:24 --> 25:26uterine structures in terms of its
  • 25:26 --> 25:29ability to carry a pregnancy down the road.
  • 25:31 --> 25:35So moving on to the patients who have
  • 25:35 --> 25:37metastatic cancer for whom chemotherapy
  • 25:37 --> 25:40or immunotherapy are indicated,
  • 25:40 --> 25:43can you first of all tell us a little
  • 25:43 --> 25:46bit about how many patients or what
  • 25:46 --> 25:48proportion of patients with cervical
  • 25:48 --> 25:50cancer present with metastatic
  • 25:50 --> 25:52disease versus non metastatic and
  • 25:52 --> 25:54and what's their prognosis like?
  • 25:55 --> 25:58Yes. Fortunately we do not see a
  • 25:58 --> 26:00high number of patients.
  • 26:00 --> 26:01We're probably talking in the order
  • 26:01 --> 26:04of five to 10% who are presenting
  • 26:04 --> 26:05with metastatic disease when they
  • 26:05 --> 26:07first show up to the clinic.
  • 26:07 --> 26:09And this is likely due to
  • 26:09 --> 26:11our excellent screening and patients
  • 26:11 --> 26:13being aware of the symptoms to get care
  • 26:13 --> 26:16to detect disease in its earliest stage.
  • 26:16 --> 26:18But when these patients do show up,
  • 26:18 --> 26:19you know for years we did not have
  • 26:19 --> 26:21much in terms of options to offer them.
  • 26:21 --> 26:23Cytotoxic chemotherapy was really
  • 26:23 --> 26:26all that we had and prognosis
  • 26:26 --> 26:28was not great for those patients.
  • 26:28 --> 26:31We're very excited to see the rapid
  • 26:31 --> 26:33expansion of drug development in the
  • 26:33 --> 26:35cervical cancer space even over the
  • 26:35 --> 26:38last three to four years where we
  • 26:38 --> 26:40have seen a number of new approvals
  • 26:40 --> 26:42and really ongoing interest and
  • 26:42 --> 26:44excitement in additional clinical
  • 26:44 --> 26:47trials that will hopefully see
  • 26:47 --> 26:49these drugs brought into the ovarian
  • 26:49 --> 26:51cancer space to help more women.
  • 26:52 --> 26:54Can you talk a little
  • 26:54 --> 26:56bit about some of the ongoing
  • 26:56 --> 26:57clinical trials and research
  • 26:57 --> 26:59that you're most excited about?
  • 27:00 --> 27:01Yeah, absolutely.
  • 27:01 --> 27:03You know like all cancers we often
  • 27:03 --> 27:06see the new drugs develop for patients
  • 27:06 --> 27:08you know later in their cancer
  • 27:08 --> 27:10journey and it takes some time for
  • 27:10 --> 27:13those medications to trickle into
  • 27:13 --> 27:16the earlier phase of cancer treatment.
  • 27:16 --> 27:18And so use of immunotherapy
  • 27:18 --> 27:20in the earlier elements,
  • 27:20 --> 27:23meaning not waiting for
  • 27:23 --> 27:25recurrence or maybe in patients
  • 27:25 --> 27:27who have a tumor that is perhaps
  • 27:27 --> 27:28too big for fertility sparing.
  • 27:28 --> 27:30But maybe we can use an immunotherapy
  • 27:30 --> 27:33to shrink that down and then offer
  • 27:33 --> 27:34patients a fertility sparing option.
  • 27:34 --> 27:37I think would be very exciting
  • 27:37 --> 27:38because with immunotherapy we really
  • 27:38 --> 27:41see a difference in the side effect
  • 27:41 --> 27:43profile for patients as well.
  • 27:43 --> 27:44So it's not just about the
  • 27:44 --> 27:46long term cancer outcomes,
  • 27:46 --> 27:48but how patients feel their quality
  • 27:48 --> 27:50of life and their experience
  • 27:50 --> 27:52during their cancer care.
  • 27:52 --> 27:54And immunotherapy seems to be
  • 27:54 --> 27:56offering patients a different but
  • 27:56 --> 27:58in somewhat improved side effect
  • 27:58 --> 28:01profile when we compare it to
  • 28:01 --> 28:02some of the older chemotherapies.
  • 28:02 --> 28:03Other than that,
  • 28:03 --> 28:06we're excited to see some updated
  • 28:06 --> 28:08cervical surgery trials that have
  • 28:08 --> 28:10been presented in conference format
  • 28:10 --> 28:12to suggest that maybe for certain
  • 28:12 --> 28:14women the radical surgery is not
  • 28:14 --> 28:17necessary anymore and we can do a
  • 28:17 --> 28:20smaller less invasive hysterectomy,
  • 28:20 --> 28:22but confer a similar long term
  • 28:22 --> 28:24outcome for those women.
  • 28:24 --> 28:26And that would be a real game changer
  • 28:26 --> 28:28in the surgical treatment of this cancer.
  • 28:28 --> 28:29So we look forward to that
  • 28:29 --> 28:30publication coming up soon.
  • 28:31 --> 28:32Doctor Mitchell Clark is an
  • 28:32 --> 28:34Assistant professor of Obstetrics,
  • 28:34 --> 28:36Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences
  • 28:36 --> 28:38at the Yale School of Medicine.
  • 28:38 --> 28:40If you have questions,
  • 28:40 --> 28:42the address is canceranswers@yale.edu,
  • 28:42 --> 28:45and past editions of the program
  • 28:45 --> 28:47are available in audio and written
  • 28:47 --> 28:48form at yalecancercenter.org.
  • 28:48 --> 28:51We hope you'll join us next week to
  • 28:51 --> 28:53learn more about the fight against
  • 28:53 --> 28:55cancer here on Connecticut Public Radio.
  • 28:55 --> 28:57Funding for Yale Cancer Answers is
  • 28:57 --> 29:00provided by Smilow Cancer Hospital.